Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:33:01.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Growth Ambients on the Local Atomic Structure of Thermally Grown Silicon Dioxide Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. T. Fitch
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
G. Lucovsky
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
Get access

Abstract

This paper represents a study of the local atomic structure of SiO2 films formed by thermal oxidation in dry oxygen, pyrolytic steam, and a variety of different sequences of these ambients. All oxidations were carried out at 850 °C. Local atomic structure was studied via infrared spectroscopy (IR). The growth ambient dependence of the frequency v, and half-width Δv, of the bond stretching feature, and the refractive index, n, was investigated. Consistent with previous work [1,2] it was found that.when the majority of the sample thickness was grown in steam the oxides were generally less dense than dry oxides. Also, the last ambient in a sequential oxidation process was found to have the most influence on the oxide properties. The observed variations in v, Δv, and n could be readily explained in terms of systematic changes in the bond angle at the oxygen bonding site between corner connected tetrahedra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fitch, J.T. and Lucovsky, G., Proc. MRS, Vol.92, Rapid Thermal Processing of Electronic Materials, p. 89.Google Scholar
2. Fitch, J.T. and Lucovsky, G., AVS Fall Meeting, Anahiem, CA, 2–6 November 1987.Google Scholar
3. Irene, E.A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 121, 1613 (1974).Google Scholar
4. Stolen, R.H. and Walrafen, G.E., J. Chem. Phys. 64, 2623 (1978).Google Scholar
5. Hetherington, G. and Jack, K.H., Physics and Chemistry of Glasses 3, 129 (1962).Google Scholar