Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:27:52.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect Of Extended Superdislocation / Domain Boundary Interactions in Ordered Intermetallic Compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Tie-Sheng Rong
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy & Materials, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K
Mark Aindow
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3136, USA
Ian P. Jones
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy & Materials, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K
Get access

Abstract

It has been known for many years that the presence of a distribution of domain boundaries in crystals with ordered superlattice structures can affect both the separation of glissile superpartial dislocations and the yield stress. Based on the details of the interactions between the domain boundaries and glissile extended superdislocations, we incorporate the effects of the thin band of perfect crystal that arises whencoupled superpartial dislocations straddle a domain boundary, and the additional domain boundary area createdonce the whole superdislocation has passed through. If these effects are included then, in an ordered phase containing many domains, we would expect the equilibrium separation of the coupled superpartial dislocations to vary more significantly with domain size than is predicted by previous models. These effects also change the way in which yield stress is predicted to vary with domain size. This variation gives a much better match to published experimental data than existing models.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Marcinkowski, M.J. and Fisher, R.M., J. Appl. Phys., 34, 2135 (1963).Google Scholar
2. Cottrell, A.H., Relation of Properties to Microstructure,ASM Monograph, 131 (1954).Google Scholar
3. Rong, T.S., Aindow, M. and Jones, I.P., in preparation.Google Scholar
4. Ardley, G.W., Acta metall., 3, 525 (1955).Google Scholar
5. Sastry, S.L. and Ramaswami, B., Phil. Mag., 33, 375 (1976).Google Scholar
6. Morris, D.G. and Smallman, R.E., Acta metall., 23, 73 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Hultgren, R., Desai, P.D., Hawkins, D.T., Gleiser, M. and Kelley, K.K., Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys (AmericanSociety for Metals) 258 (1973).Google Scholar