Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:26:18.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Crystal Structure on Sputtering: Molecular Dynamics Calculations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Che-Chen Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Horng Huah Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Paul Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Get access

Abstract

Molecular dynamics calculations have been used to study the ion-etching process by a focused-ion beam. Ion-induced atomic displacement in a Ag surface initiates collision cascades which lead to particle sputtering from the surface. Tracing collision cascades reveals that the sputtering is mainly caused by a surface atom being sideswiped by its neighboring atom traveling in a surface channel oriented a certain angle away from the direction of ejection. Depending on the angle of detection and on the kinetic energy of sputtering, the ejecting particles may proceed along crystallographic directions parallel to either the close-packed or the non-close-packed rows of atoms in the surface. The preferred direction of ejection is sensitive to variations in the polar angle of detection and in the ejection energy. For those residual atoms initially located within four lattice spacings from the target atom, the most probable distance of displacement is less than one eighth of the equilibrium bond length in the crystal bombarded by Ar† ions of I keV energy. The structural perturbation increases as the ion energy is increased from 0.2 keV to I keV, but decreases as the energy is increased further.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.a) Whitlow, H. J., Hautala, M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B18, 370 (1987); b) M. Szymonski, W. Huang, J. Onsgaard, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B14, 263 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Collart, E., Visser, R. J., Surf. Sci. 218 (1989) L497.Google Scholar
3. Thompson, M. W., Phys. Rep. 69, 335 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Randall, J. N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4 (1986) 777.Google Scholar
5. Winograd, N., Garrison, B. J., Harrison, D. E. Jr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1120 (1978).Google Scholar
6. Harrison, D. E. Jr, Crit. Rev. Sol. St. Mater. Sci. 14, S (1988).Google Scholar
7. Moliere, G., S. Naturf. 2A, 133 (1947).Google Scholar
8. Firsov, O. B., JETP (Sov. Phys.) 6, 534 (1958).Google Scholar
9. Chang, C.-C., Winograd, N., Phys. Rev. B39, 3467 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Winograd, N., Springer Series in Chem. Phys. 35, 403 (1983).Google Scholar
11.a) Larson, S. A., Lauderback, L. L., Surf. Sci. 284, 1 (1993); b) F. Masson, H. Bu, M. Shi, J. W. Rabalais, Surf. Sci. 249, 313 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Garrison, B. J., Winograd, N., and Harrison, D. E. Jr, Surf. Sci. 87 (1979) 101.Google Scholar
13.See for example, Webb, R. P., Harrison, D. E. Jr, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 5243 (1982).Google Scholar
14. Al-Bayati, A. H., Orrman-Rossiter, K. G., Armour, D. G., Surf. Sci. 249, 293 (1991).Google Scholar