Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:33:26.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Coupling Agent on the Dispersion of PETG Montmorillonite Nanocomposite films.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ajit Ranade
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203–5310
Nandika D'Souza
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203–5310
Bruce Gnade
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75083–0688
Christopher Thellen
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Soldier System Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760–5020
Caitlin Orroth
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Soldier System Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760–5020
Danielle Froio
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Soldier System Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760–5020
Jeanne Lucciarini
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Soldier System Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760–5020
Jo Ann Ratto
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Soldier System Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760–5020
Get access

Abstract

Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) is a clear amorphous polymer, which is extensively used in flexible packaging. The dual packaging requirements of recyclability and long-term shelf life are often difficult to achieve. Meeting these needs become more urgent when considering food packaging for large volumes of soldiers positioned in different parts of the world. Our approach is to develop a high barrier PET packaging system via the Montmorillonite layered silicate (MLS) based nano technology. Prior research has indicated the significant impact of the polymer crystalline regions on the properties of the resultant nanocomposite. Therefore we must first investigate the amorphous PETG. We must also investigate the influence of increased matrix polarity on dispersion of the PETG by incorporating maleic anhydride (MA) onto the PETG backbone. The influence of the clay concentration and maleation are independently investigated. The glass transition of the as-processed and annealed samples are analyzed using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) while the thermal stability is determined using Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). Testing showed a slight depression in the glass transition temperature of PETG film when the MLS is introduced into the system. The nanocomposite films also demonstrated a lower thermal stability in relation to the neat PETG films. The barrier properties were determined on an in-house built calibration unit based on atomic mobility under high vacuum. X-ray diffraction and TEM were utilized to determine the dispersion of the MLS in PETG. The results indicate that the dispersion was concentration independent but maleation of the PETG led to a slight decrease in agglomeration. An increased ultimate tensile strength and modulus was observed in PETG nanocomposites. The barrier properties were improved by incorporating the MLS into the system. Maleation of the PETG resulted in significant yellowing of the nanocomposites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brydson, J., Plastics materials, Butterworth Heinemann 1999.Google Scholar
2. Saunders, K.J., Organic Polymer Chemistry, Chapman and Hall 1988.Google Scholar
3. Kojima, Y, Fukumori, K, Usuki, A, Okada, A, Kurauchi, T. J. Mater Sci Lett, 1993; 12:889.Google Scholar
4. Giannelis, E.P. Adv mater, 1996, 8:1:29.Google Scholar
5. Krishnamoorti, R, Vaia, R.A, Giannelis, E.P, Chem Mater, 1996, 8:1728.Google Scholar
6. Pinnavaia, T.J., Beall, G.W., Polymer Clay nanocomposites, 2001.Google Scholar
7. Bidadi, H, Schroeder, PA and Pinnavaia, TJ, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1998, 49:12: 1435.Google Scholar
8. Burnside, SD and Giannelis, EP, Chem. Mater. 1995, 7:9: 1597.Google Scholar
9. Lan, T. and Pinnavaia, T.J., Chem. Mater., 1994, 6:12:2216.Google Scholar
10. Kornmann, X., Berglund, L.A. and Sterte, J., Polymer Eng. & Sci., 1998, 38:8:1351.Google Scholar
11. Vaia, R., Giannelis, P., Macromolecules 1997, 30:8000.Google Scholar