Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:14:50.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Ar+ Ion Implantation on the Impact-Abrasive Wear Property of Cu-Polyimide System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

S. K. Koh  and
K. D. Pae
S. K. Koh
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, Department of Mechanics and Materials Science, Piscataway N.J.08855-0909
K. D. Pae
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, Department of Mechanics and Materials Science, Piscataway N.J.08855-0909
Get access

Abstract

A thin Cu film(400 Å) was deposited on a smooth polyimide(PI) substrate. Ar+ ion implantation onto the Cu/PI film has been shown to mix Cu and PI and to modify the impact-abrasive wear property. Ar+ ions with energies of 200 keV, and dosage between 1015 to 4×1016 ions/cm2 were used. The surface analyses were carried out with RBS, X-ray and Optical Microscope. The wear properties of the Cu-PI system were determined by a newly constructed Impact-Abrasive Wear Tester. An X-ray diffraction study shows an increase in Cu( 111 )peak with Ar+ ion dosage. The wear property was found to be a function of ion energy, ion dosage, crystallinity of Cu, the amount of mixing of Cu and PI, and the damage of PI substrate due to ion implantation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 119: Symposium F – Adhesions in Solids , 1988 , 133
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Weber, D.C., Brant, P., Carosella, C.A. and Banks, L.G., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm., 522 (1981)Google Scholar
2. Forrest, S.R., Kaplan, M.L., Schmidt, P.H., Venkatesan, T. and Lovinger, A.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 41,708(1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Koon, N.C., Weber, D., Pehrsson, P., and Schindler, A.I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 27,445(1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Herman, H., Nucl. Instrum.& Methods 182/183, 887(1981)Google Scholar
5. Baron, M., Chang, A.L., Schreurs, J. and Kossowsky, R., Nucl. Instrum.& Methods 182/183,531(1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. EerNisse, E.P. and Picraux, S.T., J. Appl. Pyhs. 48, 9(1977)Google Scholar
7. Dearnaley, G., Rad. Effects 63, 1(1982)Google Scholar
8. Follstaedt, D.M., Yost, F.G., Pope, L.E., Picraux, S.T. and Knapp, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43(4), 358(1983)Google Scholar
9. Lee, L.H. “Polymer wear and its Control ACS Symposium series” Washington, pp77–134(1985)Google Scholar
10. Koh, S.K. and Pae, K.D., To be published.Google Scholar
11. Doolittle, L., Nucl. Instrum.&Methods B9, 344(1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Friedrich, K. “Friction and Wear of Polymer Composites” Elsevier, New York pp1–23,(1986)Google Scholar