Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:26:13.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of anodization conditions on the synthesis of TiO2 nanopores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Subhasish Chatterjee
Affiliation:
[email protected], The Graduate Center of CUNY and Queens College, Chemistry, 65-30 Kissena Blvd, Remsen 206, Flushing, NY, 11367, United States, 718-9974231, 718-997-5531
Miriam Ginzberg
Affiliation:
[email protected], Queens College, Chemistry, 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY, 11367, United States
Bonnie Gersten
Affiliation:
[email protected], Queens College, Chemistry, 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY, 11367, United States
Get access

Abstract

Nanoporous structures play a promising role in the development of nanomechanical, nanoelectrical and biosensing devices. In addition, nanopores can be utilized as chemical and gas sensors. TiO2 is a semiconductor material, which can have a wide range of applications in nanopore-based sensors. In this study, TiO2 nanopores were prepared by electrochemical anodization. Titanium was used as the anode, while platinum was used as the cathode in an electrochemical cell filled with a hydrofluoric acid electrolyte solution. During the preparation process, titanium was converted to its oxide form. Nanostructures were synthesized under varying physical conditions, including HF concentrations of 0.5-10% and anodization times of 5-30 minutes. The resulting nanopore structures were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). With a progressive increase in HF concentration (from 0.5% to 10%), the diameter of the nanopores decreased, from approximately 100 nm in diameter to 50 nm. The nanopores showed a transformation from tube-like structures to pore networks with increased HF concentration or anodization time. The results show that the dimensions and morphology of the nanopores can be controlled by alteration of the anodization conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tian, L., Ram, K. Bhargava, Ahmad, I., Menon, L., and Holtz, M., Optical properties of a nanoporous array in silicon. Journal of Applied Physics, 97, 026101–3 (2005)Google Scholar
2. Hu, Y.S., Guo, Y.G., Yu-Guo, , Sigle, W., Hore, S., Balaya, P., and Maier, J., Electrochemical lithiation synthesis of nanoporous materials with superior catalytic and capacitive activity. Nature Materials, 5(9), 713717 (2006)Google Scholar
3. Hepel, M., Kumarihamy, I., Zhong, C.J., Nanoporous TiO2-supported bimetallic catalysts for methanol oxidation in acidic media. Electrochemistry Communications, 8, 14391444 (2006)Google Scholar
4. Nakane, J.J., Akenson, M., and Marziali, A., Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis. Topical Review, 15, R1365–R1393 (2003)Google Scholar
5. Baker, L.A., Choi, Y., and Martin, C.R., Nanopore membranes for biomaterials synthesis, biosensing and bioseparations. Current Nanoscience, 2, 243255 (2006)Google Scholar
6. Mor, G.K., Shankar, K., Paulose, M., Varghese, O.K., and Grimes, C.A., Enhanced photo cleavage of water using titania nanotube arrays. Nano Letters, 5, 191195 (2005)Google Scholar
7. Paulose, M., Varghese, O.K., Mor, G.K., Grimes, C.A., and Ong, K.G., Unprecedented ultrahigh hydrogen gas sensitivity in undoped titania nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 17 398402 (2006)Google Scholar
8. Choi, J., Wehrspohn, R.B., Lee, J., and Gosel, U., Anodization of nanoimprinted titanium: a comparison with formation of porous alumina. Electrochimica Acta, 49, 26452652 (2004)Google Scholar
9. Pan, S., and Rothberg, L.J., Interferometric sensing of biomolecular binding using nanoporous aluminium oxide templates. Nano Lett, 3, 811814 (2003)Google Scholar
10. A.J., Storm et al, Fast DNA translocation through solid state nanopore, Nano. Lett., 5, 11931197 (2005)Google Scholar
11. Aksimentiev, A., and Schulten, K., Imaging α-hemolysin with molecular dynamics: ionic conductance and osmotic permeability, and the electrophoretic potential map, Biophys. J, 88, 37453761 (2005)Google Scholar
12. Heng, J. B., et al, Sizing DNA using a nanometer-diameter pore, Biophys. J. 87, 29052911 (2004)Google Scholar
13. Quan, X., Yang, S., Ruan, X., and Zhao, H., Preparation of titania nanotubes and their environmental applications as electrode, Environ.Sci.Technol.,39, 37703775 (2005)Google Scholar
14. Gong, D., Grimes, C.A., Varghese, O.K., Hu, W., Sing, R.S., Chen, Z., and Dickey, E.C., Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation, J.Mater.Res., 16, 3331 (2001)Google Scholar