Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:26:39.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EELS Spectrum Imaging and Tomography Studies of Simulated Nuclear Waste Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Guang Yang ,
Zineb Saghi ,
Xiaojing Xu ,
Russell Hand  and
Günter Möbus
Guang Yang
Affiliation:
[email protected], The University of Sheffield, Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Zineb Saghi
Affiliation:
[email protected], The University of Sheffield, Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Xiaojing Xu
Affiliation:
[email protected], The University of Sheffield, Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Russell Hand
Affiliation:
[email protected], The University of Sheffield, Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Günter Möbus
Affiliation:
[email protected], The University of Sheffield, Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) has been widely used in analysis of ceramic, minerals and semiconductors. It can provide the unique advantage of sensitivity to composition, coordination and valency, while providing nano-scale spatial resolution. Due to the electron irradiation sensitivity, EELS studies on glass are quite rare. However, using special care in glass-composition selection and by recording time series of EELS-spectra to monitor any structural changes, EELS then becomes a very useful technique to study glass-chemistry and glass structure with the highest spatial resolution of all chemically sensitive techniques. Alkali borosilicate glasses (ABS) doped with Cr2O3 (2 mol%), CeO2 (4 mol%) and ZrO4 (4 mol%) were melted, cooled and annealed in the context of simulating radionuclide immobilisation glasses. Precipitates with diameter in the range of ∼20 nm to ∼200 nm were found homogeneously distributed in the glass. In preliminary studies we measured the oxidation state in the glass and in precipitates via evaluation of the Ce-M-edge double white line ratio, confirming the crystals as Ce(IV) oxide. We also found Boron K-edge ELNES spectra as a sensitive signal to boron coordination (N4 = BO4/(BO3+BO4)), which is found at N4 ratios of around 35-45%.

In the present study we have extended this work to the acquisition of dense line scans (spectrum imaging) across an area of interest on our composite glass with emphasis on three questions:

(i) Change of cerium valence upon transition from the glass to the precipitates?

(ii) Possible oscillation of boron N4-ratio in the glass within a line scan as a consequence of random medium-order related glass fluctations when scanning the <5nm probe across a seemingly homogeneous area?

(iii) N4-changes in the immediate glass layer surrounding the precipitates?

Our ongoing research has produced results which prove a systematic change of the Ce oxidation state from precipitates (+IV) to glass (mixed +III/+IV). It is found that boron coordination is constant within the sensitivity given by signal-to-noise in the glass matrix. A change of the Boron K-edge fine structure upon crossing a nanoparticle during one particular linescan has been observed, which could hint to a coordination change of the glass layer surrounding the particle. Other linescan measurements have not shown any change and acquisition of an enlarged better statistic is work in progress.

The ABS-glass with distributed nanoparticles provides an ideal example of a 3D nanocomposite. The only proven technique for the three-dimensional reconstruction of such materials on the nanoscale is electron tomography. We present the first results of a 3D reconstructed nuclear waste glass by using a tilt series of ADF STEM images covering a glass fragment of 2000nm field of view containing several tens of nanoparticles distributed around its volume.

Keywords

electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS)transmission electron microscopy (TEM)scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 985: Symposium NN – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXX , 2006 , 0985-NN06-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lopez, C., Deschanels, X., Bart, J. M., Boubals, J. M., Den Auwer, C., Simoni, E., J. Nucl. Mater., 312, 76–80 (2003).Google Scholar
2. W., Lutze, Ewing, R. C., eds., Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988) pp.1–192.Google Scholar
3. Manara, A., Antonini, M., Camagni, P., Gibson, P. N., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res., B1, 475–480 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Parkinson, B. G., Holland, D., Smith, M. E., Howes, A. P., Scales, C. R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 351, 2425–2432 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Giuli, G., Paris, E., Mungall, J., Romano, C., Dingwell, D., Am. Mineralogist, 89, 1640–1646 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Dalba, G., Fornasini, P., Rocca, F., Monti, F., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 41(5), 290–295 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Kapoutsis, J. A. et al., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 41 (5), 321–324 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Fortner, J. A., Buck, E.C., Ellison, A. J. G., Bates, J. K., Ultramicroscopy, 67, 77–81 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Yang, G., Möbus, G., Hand, R. J., Micron, 37, 433–441 (2006).Google Scholar
10. Xu, H., Wang, Y., J. Nucl. Mater., 265, 117–123 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Garvie, L. A. J., Buseck, P. R., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 60, 1943–1947 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Calvert, C. C., Brown, A., Brydson, R., J. Elect. Spectr. Rel. Phenom., 143, 173–187 (2005).Google Scholar
13. Egerton, R. F., Electron Energy –Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope, 2nd ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1996) pp. 301–403.Google Scholar
14. van Aken, P. A., Liebscher, B., Styrsa, V. J., Phys. Chem. Minerals, 25, 323–327 (1998).Google Scholar
15. Yang, G., Möbus, G., Hand, R. J., Journal of Physics: Conference Series 26, 73–76 (2006).Google Scholar
16. Garvie, L. A. J., Xu, H., Wang, Y., Putnam, R. L., J. Phys Chem Sol, 66, 902–905 (2005).Google Scholar
17. Schreiber, H. D. and Hockman, A. L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 70 [8], 591–594 (1987).Google Scholar
18. Stennett, M. C., Hyatt, N. C., Madrell, E. R., Gibb, F. G. F., Moebus, G., Lee, W. E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 932, 623–630 (2006).Google Scholar
19. Short, R. J., Möbus, G., Yang, G., Hand, R. J., Hyatt, N. C., and Lee, W. E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 824, CC8.19–24, 351–356 (2004).Google Scholar
20. Sun, K., Wang, L. M., Ewing, R. C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 757, II5.3 (2003).Google Scholar
21. Ojovan, M. I., Lee, W. E., An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005) pp. 213–248.Google Scholar
22. Möbus, G., Inkson, B. J., Ross, I. M., Morrison, R., Micros. & Microanal., 10 (Suppl 2), 1196–1197, (2004).Google Scholar
23. Xu, X., Saghi, Z., Yang, G., Peng, Y., Inkson, B. J., Gay, R., Möbus, G., this conference, symposium KK.Google Scholar
24. Möbus, G., Doole, R. D. and Inkson, B. J.. Ultramicroscopy, 96, 433–451 (2003).Google Scholar
25. Yang, G., Möbus, G., Hand, R. J., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 47, (2006), in press.Google Scholar