Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:43:43.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamics of Cadmium Telluride Etching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

K. D. Dobson ,
P. D. Paulson ,
B. E. McCandless  and
R. W. Birkmire
K. D. Dobson
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
P. D. Paulson
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
B. E. McCandless
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
R. W. Birkmire
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
Get access

Abstract

CdTe etching was investigated using variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry and glancing angle x-ray diffraction. Treatment with HNO3:H3PO4 (NP) based etches was shown to form amorphous-Te surface films which spontaneously crystallize following etching. Br2/methanol (BM) etching forms very thin amorphous-Te films. NP-etched surfaces are stable in ambient air for ∼1 hr before beginning to oxidize, while BM etched films oxidize immediately following treatment. CdTe grain boundary etching by NP was minimized using more acidic etches. Device analysis suggests that a higher Te content produces more stable back contacts by attenuating Cu diffusion. Mechanistic details of NP etching are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 763: Symposium B – Compound Semiconductor Photovoltaics , 2003 , B3.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Sarlund, J., Ritala, M., Leskela, M., Siponmaa, E. and Zilliacus, R., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 44, 177 (1996).Google Scholar
[2] Danaher, W. J., Lyons, L. E., Marychurch, M. and Morris, G. C., Appl. Surf. Sci., 27, 338 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Haring, J.-P., Werthen, J. G. and Bube, R. H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 1, 1469 (1983).Google Scholar
[4] Arwin, H., Aspnes, D. E. and Rhiger, D. R., J. Appl. Physl., 54, 7132 (1984).Google Scholar
[5] Li, X., Niles, D. W., Hasoon, F. S., Matson, R. J. and Sheldon, P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17, 805 (1999).Google Scholar
[6] Aspnes, D. E. and Arwin, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 2, 1309 (1984).Google Scholar
[7] Lee, W. Y., Coufal, H., Davis, C. R., Jipson, V., Lim, G., Parrish, W., Sequeda, F., and Davis, R. E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 4, 2988 (1986).Google Scholar
[8] Batzner, D. L., Wendt, R., Romeo, A., Zogg, H., Tiwari, A. N., Thin Solid Films, 361, 463 (2000).Google Scholar
[9] CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th ed., edited by Weast, R. C. and Astle, M. J. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1989).Google Scholar
[10] Pourbaix, M., Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966).Google Scholar
[11] Dobson, K. D., I. Visoly-Fisher, Hodes, G. and Cahen, D., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 62, 295 (2000).Google Scholar