Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:57:59.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamical Transition to Step-Flow Growth During Homoepitaxy of GaAs (001)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

B. G. Orr ,
J. Sudijono  and
M. D. Johnson
B. G. Orr
Affiliation:
The Harrison M. Randall Laboratory of Physics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120
J. Sudijono
Affiliation:
The Harrison M. Randall Laboratory of Physics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120
M. D. Johnson
Affiliation:
The Harrison M. Randall Laboratory of Physics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120
Get access

Abstract

The evolution of surface morphology of molecular-beam-epitaxy-grown GaAs (001) has been studied by scanning tunneling microscope. Images show that in the early stages of deposition the morphology oscillates between one -with twodimensional nucleation and coalescing islands, i.e. flat terraces. After the initial oscillatory regime, the system evolves to a dynamical steady state. This state is characterized by a constant step density. As such, the growth mode can be called a generalized step flow. Comparison with RHEED shows that there is a direct correspondence between the surface step density and the RHEED specular intensity. An increase in step density results in a decrease in specular intensity. Additionally, further deposition beyond 120 monolayers (up to 1450 monolayers) display a slowly increasing surface roughness.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 312: Symposium P – Common Themes and Mechanisms of Epitaxial Growth , 1993 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Joyce, B.A., Contemporary Physics, 32, 21 (1991) and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] For a general review, see Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction and Reflection Electron Imaging of surfaces NATO ASI series B vol.188 edited by Larsen, P.K. and Dobson, P.J. (Plenum, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
[3] Orr, B.G., Snyder, C.W., and Johnson, M.D., Rev. Sci. Instrum, 6, 1400 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Sudijono, J., Johnson, M.D., Snyder, C.W., Elowitz, M.B., and Orr, B.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2811 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Ohta, K., Kojima, T., and Nakagawa, T., J. Cryst. Growth 95, 71 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Shitara, T., Vvedensky, D.D., Wilby, M.R., Zhang, J., Neave, J.H., and Joyce, B.A., Phys. Rev. B. 46, 6825 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Pukite, P.R., Lent, C.S., and Cohen, P.I., Surf. Sci. 161, 39 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Clarke, S. and Vvedensky, D.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2235 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Shitara, T., Vvedensky, D.D., Wilby, M.R., Zhang, J., Neave, J.H., and Joyce, B.A., Phys. Rev. B. 46, 6815 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Ghaisas, S. V. and Madhukar, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1066 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Knibb, M.G. and Maksym, P.A., Surf. Sci. 25, 25 (1987)Google Scholar
[12] Dobson, P.J., Joyce, B.A., Neave, J.H., and Zhang, J., J. Crystal Growth, 81, 1 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Kawamura, T. and Maksym, P.A., Surf. Sci. 161, 12 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Neave, J.H., Joyce, B.A., Dobson, P.J., and Norton, N., Appl. Phys. A. 31, 1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Knibb, M.G. (preprint)Google Scholar
[16] Our data are not meant to rule out other models. However, to be consistent with the experimental conditions, the step density model is used. These conditions do not allow us to make a stetement about other modelsGoogle Scholar