Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:51:35.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamical Ising Model Simulations of Nucleation and Growth in Copper-Cobalt Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Alfred Cerezo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Jonathan M. Hyde
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Michael K. Miller
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6436.
Rohan P. Setna
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
George D. W. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

A simple dynamical Ising model on a fixed lattice with a single bond energy parameter has been used to simulate the kinetics of diffusion during solid-state phase transformations in binary metallic alloys. The results of these simulations are compared with direct real-space measurements of the atomic distributions of elements in alloys, obtained with the position-sensitive atom probe. Despite the simplicity of the model, there is good quantitative agreement between the development of micro-structure in the simulation and the nucleation and growth of cobalt-rich precipitates in copper-cobalt alloys.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Christian, J. W., The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, Part I (2nd Edition), Pergammon, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
2. Materials Science and Technology. Volume 5: Phase Transformations in Materials, (eds. Cahn, R.W., Haasen, P. and Kramer, E.J.), VCH, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
3. Müller, E.W., Panitz, J.A. and McLane, S.B., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 39, 83 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Miller, M.K. and Smith, G.D.W., Atom Probe Microanalysis: Principles and Applications in Materials Science (MRS, Pittsburgh, 1989).Google Scholar
5. Cerezo, A., Godfrey, T.J., Grovenor, C.R.M., Hetherington, M.G., Hyde, J.M., Liddle, J.A., Mackenzie, R.A.D. and Smith, G.D.W., EMSA Bulletin 20, 77 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Teller, A.H. and Teller, E., J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953)Google Scholar
7. Sundman, B., Janson, B. and Andersson, J., Calphad 9 (2), 13 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Hyde, J.M., Cerezo, A., Hetherington, M.G., Miller, M.K. and Smith, G.D.W., Surf. Sci. 266, 370 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Aaronson, H.I. and LeGoues, F.K., Metall. Trans. A 23A, 1915 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Nishizawa, T. and Ishida, K., Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 5, 161 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Servi, I. and Turnbull, D., Acta Metall. 14, 161 (1966).Google Scholar
12. Shiflet, G.J., Lee, Y.W. and Aaronson, H.I., Scripta Metall. 15, 723 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Chisholm, M.F. and Laughlin, D.E., in Phase Transformations '87 (ed. Lorimer, G.W.), Institute of Metals, London (1987), p.17.Google Scholar