Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:00:23.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dry Sliding Wear Behavior of a High-Mn Austenitic Twinning Induced Plasticity (TWIP) Steel Microalloyed with Ti

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2015

V.H. Mercado ,
I. Mejía  and
A. Bedolla-Jacuinde
V.H. Mercado
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Metalúrgicas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Edificio “U-5”, Ciudad Universitaria, 58066 Morelia, Michoacán, México. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
I. Mejía
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Metalúrgicas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Edificio “U-5”, Ciudad Universitaria, 58066 Morelia, Michoacán, México. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
A. Bedolla-Jacuinde
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Metalúrgicas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Edificio “U-5”, Ciudad Universitaria, 58066 Morelia, Michoacán, México. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

High-Mn austenitic twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) steels are the object of intense worldwide scientific study due to the promising combination of strength and ductility of these alloys. Mechanical behavior of this family of new generation steels has been extensively studied recently. However, limited information regarding their tribological properties is available in the literature. The aim of this research work is to study the wear behavior of a high-Mn austenitic Fe–20Mn–1.5Si–1.5Al–0.4C TWIP steel microalloyed with Ti. The wear behavior was evaluated under dry sliding condition by the ‘‘pin-on-ring’’ method. For this purpose, solution-treated samples were worn for 10 km against a counterface disc made of hardened AISI M2 steel, under loads of 52, 103 and 154 N, and at speeds of 0.20, 0.60 and 0.86 m/s. The wear resistance was evaluated from the average wear rate. Wear debris and worn surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). The Ti addition to TWIP steel slightly improved the wear resistance particularly at a speed of 0.86 m/s and at loads of 52 and 103 N. Results show that the wear resistance increases with increasing sliding speed. This is attributed to the formation of an oxide layer acting as a protective layer against wear, which suggests that the main wear mechanism for the studied TWIP steel under these conditions is oxidative.

Keywords

steeltribologyTi
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1765: Symposium 4A – Advanced Structural Materials—2014 , 2015 , pp. 59 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Grässel, O., Krüger, L., Frommeyer, G. and Meyer, L.W., J. Plasticity 16, 1392–1409 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouaziz, O. and Guelton, N., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 319–321, 246–249 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulami, A., Choi, K.S., Shen, Y.F., Liu, W., Sun, X. and Khaleel, M.A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 1402–1408 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes-Calderón, F., Mejía, I. and Cabrera, J.M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 562, 46–52 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, P., Devanathan, R., Jin, N. and Steele, R.K., International Conference on Rail Quality and Maintenance for Modern Rail Way Operation, edited by Kalker, J.J. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Delft, 1992), pp. 41–51.Google Scholar
Raghavan, K.S., Sastri, A.S. and Marcinkowski, M.J., Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME 245, 1569–1575 (1969).Google Scholar
Drobnjak, Dj. and Parr, J.G., Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1, 759–765 (1970).Google Scholar
White, C.H. and Honeycombe, R.W.K., J. Iron Steel Int. 200, 457–466 (1963).Google Scholar
Hsu, S.M., Shen, M.C. and Ruff, A.W., Tribol. Int. 30, 377–383 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farias, M.C.M., Souza, R.M., Sinatora, A. and Tanaka, D.K., Wear 263, 773–781 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, S.C., Tribol. Int. 35, 717–723 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callister, W.D. Jr., Materials Science and Engineering-An Introduction, (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2003), pp. 188–191.Google Scholar
Straffelini, G., Trabucco, D. and Molinari, A., Wear 250, 485–491 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, T.F.T., Sullivan, J.L. and Rowsan, D.M., Wear 94, 175–191 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejía, I., Bedolla-Jacuinde, A. and Pablo, J.R., Wear 301, 590–597 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archard, J.F., J. Appl. Phys. 24, 981–988 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inman, I.A., Datta, P.K., Du, H.L., Burnell-Gray, J.S., Pierzgalski, S. and Luo, Q., Tribol. Int. 38, 812–818 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbar, I.I., Tribol. Int. 35, 749–755 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, H., Tribol. Int. 41, 735–742 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar