Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:32:14.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Directed Self-Assembly of Thin Block Copolymer Films under Controlled Atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Sangcheol Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Institute of Standards & Technology, Polymers Division, 100 Bureau Dr., Mail Stop 8541, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, United States, 301 975 8337
R. M. Briber
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Maryland, College Park, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College Park, MD, 20742-2115, United States
Alamgir Karim
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Institute of Standards and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, United States
Ronald L. Jones
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Institute of Standards and Technology, Polymers Division, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, United States
Ho-Cheol Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA, 95120, United States
Get access

Abstract

We have developed a simple and fast methodology to control the orientation of cylindrical microdomains in thin block copolymer films under controlled atmosphere conditions. Asymmetric block copolymers of polystyrene and poly(ethylene oxide) (PS-b-PEO) were dissolved in toluene and spin coated with less than one minute exposure to different solvent vapors and controlled humidity. The specific choice of solvents was based on the polymer solubility parameters and the solvent vapor pressure. By controlling the spin coating environment we were able to produce cylinders with orientations ranging from parallel to perpendicular with respect to the substrate. Orientation was apparently controlled by the preferential affinity of the vapor atmosphere. A combinatorial gradient technique was employed to investigate the mechanism of solvent-induced microdomain orientation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Black, C. T., Guarini, K. W., Russell, T. P., Tuominen, M. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 409 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Guarini, K.W., Black, C. T., Zhang, Y., Babich, I. V., Sikorski, E. M., Gignac, L. M., IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting 22.2.1. (2003).Google Scholar
3. Black, C. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 163116 (2005).Google Scholar
4. Kim, G., Liber, M., Macromoeluces 31, 2569 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Lin, Z., Kim, D. H., Wu, X., Boosahda, L., Stone, D., LaRose, L., Russell, T. P., Adv. Mater. 14, 1373 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Kim, S. H., Misner, M. J., Xu, T., Kimura, M., Russell, T. P., Adv. Mater. 15, 226 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Harant, A. W., Bowman, C. N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 23, 14615 (2005).Google Scholar
8. Certain equipment, instruments or materials are identified in this paper in order to adequately specify the experimental details. Such identification does not imply recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology nor does it imply the materials are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Official contribution of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; not subject to copyright in the United StatesGoogle Scholar
9. Smith, A. P., Sehgal, A., Douglas, J. F., Karim, A., Amis, E. J., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 24, 131 (2003).Google Scholar
10. The data throughout the manuscript and in the figures and table are presented along with the standard uncertainty (±) involved in the measurement based on one standard deviation.Google Scholar