Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:54:27.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct Visualization of Particle Dynamics in Model CMP Geometries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Claudia M. Zettner  and
Minami Yoda
Claudia M. Zettner
Affiliation:
G. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405
Minami Yoda
Affiliation:
G. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0405
Get access

Abstract

Chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) involves complex mechanical and chemical interactions between a rough elastomeric pad, the wafer being polished and an abrasive slurry containing sub-micron diameter silica particles. The interaction between these abrasive particles and the wafer surface and their impact upon material removal rates is still unclear. Particle dynamics in a model CMP geometry are studied experimentally in this work. Only the particles that actually interact with, and presumably polish, the model wafer surface are visualized using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF). The effect of process properties such as particle diameter, particle material, pad-wafer separation and shear rate upon the particle concentration immediately adjacent to the wafer surface is investigated.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 671: Symposium M – Chemical-Mechanical Polishing 2001–Advances and Future Challenges , 2001 , M6.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fang, S.J., Garza, S., Guo, H., Smith, T.H., Shinn, G.B., Campbell, J.E., and Hartsell, M.L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 682 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Levert, J., Baker, R., Mess, F., Salant, R., Danyluk, S., STLE Annual Meeting, May 1997.Google Scholar
3. Nanz, G. and Camilletti, L.E., IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 8, 382 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Runnels, S.R., J. Electronic Materials 25, 1574 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Shi, F.G. and Zhao, B., Appl. Phys. A 67, 249 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Axelrod, D., Burghardt, T.P. and Thompson, N.L., Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 13, 247 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Santiago, J.G., Wereley, S.T., Meinhart, C.D., Beebe, D.J., and Adrian, R.J., Experiments in Fluids 25, 316 (1998).10.1007/s003480050235Google Scholar
8. Crocker, J.C. and Grier, D.G., J. Colloid Int. Sci. 179, 298 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Raffel, M., Willert, C., and Kompenhans, J., Particle Image Velocimetry A Practical Guide. (Springer, New York, 1998).10.1007/978-3-662-03637-2Google Scholar