Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:31:59.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Observation of the Effects of Cu Distribution on Electromigration Phenomena in Submicron Al Interconnects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Silva K. Theiss
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
J. A. Prybyla
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

We have performed time-resolved studies of the electromigration (EM) – induced formation, growth, migration, and spatial distribution of Al2Cu precipitates in submicron Al(0.5 wt. % Cu) runners. Of particular interest is the formation of the precipitates in relationship to the local microstructure of the runners, and the formation of voids and hillocks with respect to the location of the Al2Cu precipitates. Runners of widths 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 ýtm were tested at a current density of 2×106 A/cm2 and temperatures between 200 and 300°C. The evolution of the microstructure of the runners was evaluated using plan-view TEM, SEM, and EDX. The formation of voids and hillocks, and the growth of precipitates proceeds more rapidly as the width of the runners increases. However, a far greater number of precipitates nucleate in the 0.3 μm-wide line than in any of the others. As expected, voids are most likely to form near the cathode and hillocks near the anode. Large Al2Cu precipitates form near the anode long before failure occurs. Interestingly, the cathode-side bonding pad is not observed to serve as a good reservoir of Cu for the runners. Although the formation of voids near the cathode seems to be associated with the depletion of Cu in this region, hillocks and voids elsewhere are more likely to form at precipitates than in other parts of the line. Thus Al2Cu precipitates can act as sites for preferential EM-damage, reducing interconnect reliability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Knowlton, B.D., Frank, R.I., and Thompson, C.V., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 391, 361 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Hu, C.-K., Thin Solid Films 260, 124 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Alers, G.B., Oates, A.S., and Beverly, N.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3600 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Hu, C.-K., Small, M.B., and Ho, P.S., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 969 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Colgan, E.G. and Rodbell, K.P., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3423 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Ma, Q. and Suo, Z., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 5457 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Barkshire, I.R. and Prutton, M., J Appl. Phys. 77, 1082 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Shingubara, S., Nishida, H., Sakaue, H., and Horiike, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3860 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Riege, S.P., Hunt, A.W., and Prybyla, J.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 391, 249 (1995).Google Scholar
10. The composition of the precipitates was confirmed by EDFitzgerald, X.E.A. and Prybyla, J.A., private communication.Google Scholar
11. Shaw, T.M., Hu, C.-K., Lee, K.Y., and Rosenberg, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2296 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Prybyla, J.A., Riege, S.P., and Hunt, A.W., J. Appl. Phys., submitted.Google Scholar