Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:55:43.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusivity of Uranium(VI) in Water-Saturated Inada Granite.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Kazuya Idemitsu ,
Hirotaka Furuya ,
Kenji Murayama  and
Yaohiro Inagaki
Kazuya Idemitsu
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan
Hirotaka Furuya
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan
Kenji Murayama
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan
Yaohiro Inagaki
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812, Japan
Get access

Abstract

In the safety assessment of high level radioactive waste disposal, a significant retardation of nuclides can be expected. When radionuclides released from an underground repository are transported with the moving groundwater along cracks in the rock, the radionuclides will be retarded by not only adsorption on the surface of the cracks but also diffusion into the micropores of rock matrix.

Diffusivities of U(VI) were measured in water-saturated granite that was mined in the middle of Japan. The measured penetration profile of U(VI) was composed of two parts. Those were a steep slope near the surface and a gradual slope in the deeper part. This profile was successfully explained by considering two diffusion paths in granite. One diffusion path was possibly a fissure with a width of a few microns and another was a network of submicron pores. The volume of submicron pores was approximately 80% of the total pore volume in the granite. The orders of magnitude of apparent diffusivities for U(VI) were 10−13-10−12 m2/s through the fissure and 10−15 m2/s through the network of pores. The ratio of geometrical factors in the two paths was also calculated from each apparent diffusivity and was almost unity. This ratio calculated suggests that the pore network in the granite matrix has a similar shape to the fissure, thus the microstructure of the granite seems to be fractal.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 257: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV , 1991 , 625
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Neretnieks, I., J.Geophys.Res.,85,4379(1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Skagius, K., Neretnieks, I., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. V, edited by Lutze, W., (North-Holland, New York, 1982), pp.509–518.Google Scholar
3. Nuclear Safety and Research Association: Study on interaction of geological media with HLW radionuclides,1984(in Japanese).Google Scholar
4. Atkinson, A. and Nickerson, A.K., Nuc.Tech. 81, 100 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Muurinen, A., Rantanen, J. and Ovaskainen, R., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Manaaement, VIII, edited by Jantzen, C.M., Stone, J.A. and Ewing, R.C., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), pp.883–890.Google Scholar
6. Shimooka, K., Takabe, S., Li, H., Hirosue, F., Yamada, K., Miyahara, H., Wadachi, Y. and Hirano, K., in Proc. of the 1989 Joint International Waste Manaoement Conference, vol.1, edited by Feizollahi, F., Kohout, R. and Suzuki, A., (Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., New York, NY, 1989), pp.581–586.Google Scholar
7. Idemitsu, K., Furuya, H., Tsutsumi, R., Yonezawa, S., Inagaki, Y. and Sato, S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Manaoement. XIV, edited by Abrajano, T. Jr., and Johnson, L.H., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 212, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991), pp.427–432.Google Scholar
8. McKeegan, K.D., Phinney, D., Oversby, V.M., Brink, M. Buchholtz-ten and Smith, D.K., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Manaaement. XII, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 127, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), pp.813–821.Google Scholar
9. Fisher, J.C., J.Appl.Phys., 22, 74 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Whipple, R.T.P., Phil. Mag., 45, 1225 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Brakel, J. Van and Heertjes, P.M., Int.J.Heat Mass Transfer, 17, 1093 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Sato, S., Furuya, H., Sakamoto, Y., Okuno, T. and Yabe, I., in Proc. of 5th International Svmnosium on Water Rock Interaction, Reykjavik, (1986).Google Scholar
13. Idemitsu, K., Furuya, H., Hara, T. and Inagaki, Y., to be published in J. Nuclear Science and Technology.Google Scholar
14. Merceron, T., Velde, B., Nakashima, S., Badri, A. and Touchard, G., in Proc. of 3rd International Svmoosium on Advanced Nuclear Energv Research - Global Environment and Nuclear Enerav, Mito, 283 (1991).Google Scholar