Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:49:12.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusion-Governed-Asymmetric Growth of Amorphous Layer Under Solid-State Reaction in Ni-Zr Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

B. X. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
W. S. Lai
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Get access

Abstract

A molecular-dynamics simulation with an n-body potential was performed to study solid-state amorphization in the Ni-Zr system upon annealing at medium temperatures ranging from 300 to 600 °C. The models for simulation were a Zr-Ni-Zr sandwich consisting of both hcp Zr and fcc Ni (001) atomic planes and a bilayer with a thin preset disordered interfacial layer, respectively, for revealing the detailed amorphization process and the growing kinetics of an amorphous layer upon solid-state reaction. Our simulation results demonstrated, for the first time, that the atomic process proceeded through first diffusion, then alloying and eventually amorphization. In other words, amorphization was controlled by a diffusion-limited reaction and the growth kinetics of the amorphous layer followed exactly a t1/2 law. Another interesting finding was that the growing speeds of the amorphous layer exhibited an asymmetric behavior, i.e. the amorphous layer extended faster towards Ni lattice than that directed to Zr side. Besides, it was also found that an initiation of amorphization upon annealing was dependent to the interfacial textures, i.e. amorphization could take place when the interfaces were composed of the more open atomic planes, whereas it was suppressed if the interfaces were constructed with the close-packed planes of both lattices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schwarz, R.B. and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 415 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Schröder, H., Samwer, K. and Koster, U., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 197 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Clemens, B.M., Phys. Rev. B 33, 7615 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Cotts, E.J., Meng, W.J. and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2295 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Meng, W.J., Fultz, B., Ma, E. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 661 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Meng, W.J., Nieh, C.W. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1693 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Weissmann, M., Ramírez, R. and Kiwi, M., Phys. Rev. B 46, 2577 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Fernandes, M.G. and Pontikis, V., Mater. Sci. Forum 207–209, 173 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Chopra, K.L., Randlett, M.R. and Duff, R.H., Phil. Mag. 16, 261 (1967).Google Scholar
10. Massobrio, C., Pontikis, V. and Martin, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1142 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Rosato, V., Guillope, M. and Legrand, B., Phil. Mag. A 59, 321 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Aihara, T. Jr., Aoki, K., and Masumoto, T., Scripta Metall. et Mater. 28, 1003 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Mura, P., Demontis, P., Suffiitti, G.B., Rosato, V., and Antisari, M. Vittori, Phys. Rev. B 50, 2850 (1994).Google Scholar
14. Parrinello, M. and Rahman, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1196 (1980).Google Scholar
15. Phillpot, S.R., Yip, S. and Wolf, D., Comput. Phys. 3, 20 (1989).Google Scholar
16. van Rossum, M., Nicolet, M.-A. and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev B 29, 5498 (1984).Google Scholar