Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:43:57.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusion of Cations Along the Polymer/Metal Interface Under an Applied Electrical Potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. Nguyen  and
J. M. Pommersheim
T. Nguyen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
J. M. Pommersheim
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA
Get access

Abstract

Diffusion of cations along the polymer/metal interface controls the rate of blistering of polymer coatings on metals exposed to electrolytes. Cations are driven by both concentration and electrical potential gradients. A theoretical and experimental study was carried out on the diffusion of sodium ion along the polymer coating/steel interface under an applied potential. Mathematical models, consisting of initial and propagation stages, are derived based on a moving boundary diffusion problem. Model variables include ion diffusivity, potential gradient and distance between defects and delamination sites. Models are solved to predict ion fluxes and concentration in the blistering areas. Experimental data are analyzed to extract model parameters. Model predictions agreed well with experimental data and practical observations

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 304: Symposium H – Polymer/Inorganic Interfaces , 1993 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Funke, W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Prod. Dev., 24, 343(1985).Google Scholar
2. Nguyen, T., Hubbard, J.B., and McFadden, G.B., J. Coatings Technol., 63, 43(1991).Google Scholar
3. Martin, J., McKnight, M.E., Nguyen, T., and Embree, E., J. Coatings Technol., 61, 772(1989).Google Scholar
4. Ritter, J.J. and Kruger, J., J. Coatings Technol., 54, 51(1982).Google Scholar
5. Schwenk, W., in Corrosion Control by Organic Coatings, Leidheiser, H., Ed., Natl. Assoc. Corrosion Eng., Houston, 1980, p. 103.Google Scholar
6. Leidheiser, H. Jr., Wang, W., and Igetoft, L., Progress Organic Coatings, 11, 19 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Pommersheim, J., Nguyen, T., Zhang, Z., Lin, C., and Hubbard, J.B., National Institute of Standards Technical Note, No. 1293, May, 1992.Google Scholar
8. Martin, J., Embree, E., and Tsao, W., J. Coatings Technol., 62, 25(1990).Google Scholar