Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:44:39.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Difference in elastic properties of CrB2 determined by microscopic and macroscopic measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2013

Katsushi Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Kobe University, Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan.
Satoshi Tsutsui
Affiliation:
Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, SPring-8, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5198 Japan.
Norihiko L. Okamoto
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Haruyuki Inui
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Alfred Q.R. Baron
Affiliation:
Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, SPring-8, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5198 Japan. RIKEN, SPring-8, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5143, Japan
Get access

Abstract

CrB2 possess the hexagonal AlB2 structure which belongs to the spacegroup of P6/mmm. The compound exhibits para- to antiferro-magnetic transition at about 88 K. By using a macroscopic measurement technique, that is, a conventional resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) with a millimeter size mono-crystal, significant elastic anomalies have been observed just above the magnetic transition temperature. On the other hand, elastic constants determined by a microscopic measurement technique, that is, an inelastic X-ray scattering method (BL35XU of SPring-8, Japan) do not show any elastic anomalies at around the transition temperature. In order to explain the discrepancy, we have introduced a kind of so called ΔE effect resulting from a multidomain structure. If crystal lattice is slightly deformed by a spontaneous magnetostriction in the antiferromagnetic state, the symmetry of crystal lattice is lowered from hexagonal to monoclinic when the symmetry of magnetic structure is taken into account. By the lowering of the symmetry, the crystal consists of six magnetic domains in the antiferro magnetic state. If magnetic domain boundaries move in response to externally applied stresses, the mechanical deformation is absorbed by nonelastic deformations induced by the movement of magnetic domain boundaries. This multidomain model well explains the experimental results obtained by both microscopic (X-ray) and macroscopic (ultrasound) measurements. The microscopic measurement technique is useful to obtain the true elastic properties of crystal lattice without effects coming from a multidomain structure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burnes, R. G. and Creel, R. P., Phys. Lett. 29A, 203 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, N. L., Kusakari, M., Tanaka, K., Inui, H. and Otani, S., Acta Mater. 58, 76 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, T., Nozaki, H., Bannai, E., Ishizawa, Y., Kawase, S. and Yamane, T., J. Less-Common Metals 50, 15 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funahashi, S., Hamaguchi, Y., Tanaka, T. and Bannai, E., Solid State Comm. 23, 859 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, E., Kousaka, Y., Kakurai, K., Takeda, M. and Akimitsu, J., Physica B404, 2524 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, E. M. and Cummins, H. Z., Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1263 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhyne, J. J., Legvold, S. and Rodine, E. T., Phys.Rev, 154, 266 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köster, W., Z. Metall. 35, 57 (1943).Google Scholar