Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:27:10.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Simple Electrolytes for the Electrodeposition of Pb-Free, Sn-Based Alloy Solder Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Chunfen Han
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Alberta, Chemical and Materials Engineering, Edmonton, T6G 2G6, Canada
Qi Liu
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Alberta, Chemical and Materials Engineering, Edmonton, T6G 2G6, Canada
Douglas G. Ivey
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Alberta, Chemical and Materials Engineering, Room 536 CME, Edmonton, T6G 2G6, Canada, 780-492-2957, 780-492-2881
Get access

Abstract

A simple, cyanide-free, slightly acidic, chloride-based solution has been developed for the electrodeposition of Sn-0.7wt%Cu solder films. The solution contains only one additive (tri-ammonium citrate) other than the metal salts and is stable for more than 36 days. The optimum citrate concentration is 0.30 mol/L for 0.22 mol/L of SnCl2•2H2O. The addition of 0.003 mol/L of CuCl2•2H2O to this solution can produce near eutectic (Sn-0.7 wt% Cu) deposits, on Au, Ni or Cu substrates, at current densities of 10-12.5 mA/cm2. Plating rates are in the 20-27.5 μm/hr range at room temperature. Copper is evenly distributed (~0.7wt%Cu) through most of the thickness, with slightly higher Cu levels at the solder/Ni interface. After solder reflow at 260°C, two phases are present, Sn plus either Cu6Sn5 for Cu substrates or (Cu,Ni)6Sn5 for Ni substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Abtewa, M. and Selvadurayb, C., Materials Science and Engineering, 27, 95 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Suganuma, K., Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 5, 55 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Yanada, I., Tsujimoto, M., Okada, T., Oka, T. and Tsubokura, H., United States Patent No. 6508927 B2 (21 January 2003).Google Scholar
4. Fukuda, M., Imayoshi, K. and Matsumoto, Y., Surface and Coatings Technology, 169-170, 128 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Neveu, B., Lallemand, F., Poupon, G. and Mekhalif, Z., Applied Surface Science, 252, 3561 (2006).Google Scholar
6. Martyak, N. M. and Seefeldt, R., Electrochimica Acta, 49, 4303 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Wang, C. H. and Chen, S. W., Acta Materialia, 54, 247 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Luo, W. C., Ho, C. E., Lin, J. Y. and Kao, C. R., Materials Science and Engineering A, 396, 385 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Ho, C. E., Yang, S. C. and Kao, C. R., Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 18, 155 (2007).Google Scholar