Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:07:49.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of a Micro fluidic Nanoscale Protein Sensor Device for Improving Vascular Surgical Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shalini Prasad*
Affiliation:
[email protected], Portland State Univerity, ECE, 160-11, FAB 1900 SW 4th Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, United States, 503-725-3223
Get access

Abstract

The normal physiologic response of vascular surgery is one of acute and intense inflammation and thrombosis. Research to date on improving outcomes after surgery has focused on drugs known to be active with the adrenergic system more specifically statins. Till date there has been no correlation between inflammation post surgery and the effect of perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs on improving surgical outcomes. The goal of this research is to characterize the role perioperative inflammation and thrombosis plays in determining outcomes after surgery. The goal of this particular application is to identify two specific pro-inflammatory protein markers namely C-reactive protein (CRP) and Myloperoxidase (MPO) associated with thrombosis from a wide range of serum samples. This is achieved by integrating the principles of fabrication associated with micro and nanotechnology to develop a sensor device comprising of nano ordered porous alumina membrane embedded in an elastomer (polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS) micro fluidic base. The nano porous membrane is selectively functionalized by a two level masking technique to the binding of CRP and MPO in selected areas. The binding event results in an electrochemical reaction that in turn produces a change in the surface charge. This in turn produces a measurable change to the electrical voltage. This is measured in an in-situ, non-invasive manner from selectively metalized areas of the nano membrane. Energy density analysis yielded unique electrical identifiers for each of the protein markers. Detection sensitivity of the order of 10 ppm was observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

7. REFERENCES

[1] Troulis, M. J., Ward, B.B., and Zuniga, J.A., J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 63(10), 1436 (2005)Google Scholar
[2] Luesebrink, H., Glinsner, T., Jakeway, S.C., Crabtree, H.J., Cameron, N.S., Roberge, H., and Veres, T. J., Nanosci Nanotechnol. 5(6), 864 (2005)Google Scholar
[3] Bashir, R., Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 56(11), 1565 (2004)Google Scholar
[4] Kovacs, G.T.A., Maluf, N.I., and Petersen, K.E., Bulk micromachining of silicon, Proc. IEEE 86, 1536 (1998).Google Scholar
[5] Polla, D.L., Erdman, A.G., Robbins, W.P., Markus, D.T., Diaz-Diaz, J., Rizq, R., Nam, Y., and Brickner, H.T., Microdevices in medicine, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Bioeng. 2, 551 (2000)Google Scholar
[6] Lanza, R.P., Hayes, J.L., and Chick, W.L., Encapsulated cell technology, Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 1107 (1996).Google Scholar
[7] Aronson, D., Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2004;6(3–4):110–8.Google Scholar
[8] Damas, J.K., Puccetti, L., and Aukrust, P., Thromb Haemost. 94(1), 1 (2005)Google Scholar
[9] Moreno, P.R, and Fuster, V., J Am Coll Cardiol. 44(11), 2099 (2004)Google Scholar
[10] Masuda, H., and Satoh, M., J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 35, L126 (1996)Google Scholar
[11] Kokonou, M., and Nassiopoulou, A.G., and Giannakopoulos, K.P.. Nanotechnology, 16, 103 (2005).Google Scholar
[12] Prasad, S., Yang, M., Zhang, X., Ozkan, C.S., and Ozkan, M., J. Biomedical Micro devices. 5(2), 125 (2003).Google Scholar
[13] Prasad, S., Zhang, X., Yang, M., Ni, Y., Parpura, V., Ozkan, C.S., and Ozkan, M., J Neurosci Methods. 135(1–2), 79 (2004)Google Scholar