Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:47:24.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Water Content and Resistivity of Perfluorosulfonic Acid Fuel Cell Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Ashish Sen.
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI 48674
Kevin E.Leach
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI 48674
Richard D.Varjian
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI 48674
Get access

Abstract

Water uptake and resistivity have been determined for Dupont's Nafion-115®and Dow membrane 800 EW while in contact with a water-saturated nitrogen atmosphere using Fourier transform near-infrared (NIR), and AC impedance four point techniques in the temperature range of 23°C to 100°C. Results show that at room temperature there is a significant increase in water content and a corresponding decrease in the electrical resistivity as the relative humidity increases from 0% to 100%. Results also indicate that there is a substantial decrease in water uptake from water vapor at 100°C relative to that at 23°C. The water content of Dow membrane is higher than Nafion-115 under all conditions tested. The water contents of Dow PFSA 800 EW and Nafion-115 membranes at about 92% R.H. and 23°C are approximately 25 wt% and 18 wt%, respectively. The corresponding water content values at 100°C are 10 wt% and 8 wt%, respectively. The resistivity of the membranes decreases sharply with the temperature up to 60°C, reaches a minimum near 80°C then increases up to 100°C. The Dow membrane has lower resistivity than Nafion-115 over the entire range.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Hinatsu, J.T., Mizuhata, M. and Takenaka, H., Electrochem, J.. Soc, vol. 141, 1493, (1994).Google Scholar
2 Gottesfeld, S., Lopez, C., Valerio, J., Zawodzinski, T., J. Electrochem. Soc. vol.140, 1981, (1993).Google Scholar
3 Yeager, H.L., Twardowski, Z., Clarke, L.M., J. Electrochem Soc., 129, (2) 324, (1982).Google Scholar
4 Moore, R. B. and Martin, C., Macromolecules, 22, 3594, (1989).Google Scholar
5 Rieke, P. C. and Vanderborgh, N. E., J. Mem. Sci., 32, 313, (1987).Google Scholar
6 Falk, M., Canadian J. Chemistry, vol. 58, 1495, (1980).Google Scholar
7 Luck, W.P., in Synthetic Membrane Processes, edited by Belfort, G. (Academic Press, 1984), p.21.Google Scholar
8 Quezado, S., Kwak, C.T. and Falk, M., Can. J. Chem., vol. 62, 958, (1984).Google Scholar
9 Falk, M.. in Perfluorinated Ionomer Membranes, (ACS Symposium Series No. 180, 1982), p. 139.Google Scholar
10 Boakye, E. E. and Yeager, H. L., J. Macromol. Sci., 69, 155, (1992).Google Scholar
11 Barnes, D.J., in Structure and Properties of Ionomers. (Reidel Publishing Co., Holland, 1987), p.501.Google Scholar
12 Knop, O., Westerhaus, W.J. and Falk, M.. Can. J. Chem., 58, 270, (1980).Google Scholar
13 Tant, M.R., Darst, K.P., Lee, K.D., Martin, C.W., in Multiphase Polymers: Blends and Ionomers. (ACS Symposium Series No. 395, 1989), p.370.Google Scholar
14 Eisenberg, A. and Yeager, H.L.. Eds., Perfluorinated Ionomer Membranes, (ACS Symposium Series No. 180, 1982), p.1.Google Scholar
15 Pineri, M. and Eisenberg, A., Eds., Structure and Properties of Ionomers, (Reidel Publishing Co., Holland, 1987), p. 141.Google Scholar
16 Zawodzinski, T.A., Davey, J., Springer, T., and Gottesfeld, S., Abstract 94, p. 146, The Electrochemical Society Extended Abstracts, (1992).Google Scholar
17 Cahan, B.D., Wainright, J.S., J. Electrochem Soc., vol 140, L185, (1993).Google Scholar
18 Bird, R.B., Stewart, W. E., Lightfoot, E.N., Transport Phenomena, (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1960), p.26.Google Scholar