Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:32:35.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Time-Dependent Plastic Properties of Metals by Indentation Load Relaxation Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Simo-Pekka Hannula
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Cornell University, Bard Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853
Donald Stone
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Cornell University, Bard Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853
Che-Yu Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Cornell University, Bard Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

Load relaxation testing has been demonstrated to be useful for characterizing the time dependent plastic properties of metals. However, for testing of small material volumes, such as thin film metallizations, thin films, and contact surfaces, conventional load relaxation techniques cannot be used. For such applications an indentation test offers an attractive means for obtaining data necessary for materials characterization. This work shows that an indentation load relaxation test is experimentally feasible for thin film testing. Experiments on brass and beryllium copper samples with or without a gold/nickel plating illustrate different relaxation properties of the substrates and the surface layers. Furthermore, results of experiments on some fcc metals suggest rather simple relations between the conventional uniaxial load relaxation (LR) test and the indentation load relaxation (ILR) test.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mulhearn, T.O. and Tabor, D., J. Inst. of Metals, 89, 7 (19601961).Google Scholar
2. Aitkins, A.G., Silverio, A., and Tabor, D., J. Inst. of Metals, 94, 369 (1966).Google Scholar
3. Merchant, H.D., Murty, G.S., Bahadur, S.N., Dwivedi, L.T., and Mehrotra, Y., J. Mater. Sci., 8, 437 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chu, S.N.G. and Li, J.C.M., J. Mater. Sci., 12, 2200 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Yu, H.Y. and Li, J.C.M., J. Mater. Sci., 12, 2214 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Yu, E.C. and Li, J.C.M., Phil. Mag., 36, 811 (1977).Google Scholar
7. Chu, S.N.G. and Li, J.C.M., Mater. Sci. Eng., 39, 1 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lucas, G.E. and Pendleton, C., J. Nuc. Mater., 103 & 104, 1539 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Hannula, S.-P., Wanagel, J., and Li, C.-Y., to appear in The Use of Non-standard Subsized Specimen for Irradiated Testing, ASTM STP 840, American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
10. Hannula, S.-P., Keusseyan, R.L., Wanagel, J., and Li, C.-Y., Proc. of 12th International Conference on Electric Contact Phenomena and 13th Annual Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, p. 433, Illinois Inst. Of Tech., Chicago, Ill., 1984.Google Scholar
11. Yost, F.G., Metall. Trans. A, 14A, 947 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Johnson, K.L., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 18, 115 (1970).Google Scholar
13. Kennedy, F.E. and Ling, F.F., J. Eng. Mater. Techn., 96, 97 (1974).Google Scholar
14. Yamada, H. and Li, C.-Y., Acta Metall., 22, 249 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Hart, E.W. and Solomon, H.D., Acta Metall., 21, 295 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Atkins, A.G. and Tabor, D., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 13, 149 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Huang, F.H., Ellis, F.V., and Li, C.-Y., Metall. Trans. A, 8A, 699 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Hart, E.W., Li, C.-Y., Yamada, H., and Wire, G.L., in Constitutive Equations in Plasticity, ed. Argon, A.S., p. 149, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.Google Scholar
19. Hannula, S.-P. and Li, C.-Y, Scripta Metall., 18, 225 (1984).Google Scholar