Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:35:09.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Cl Impurities and 36Cl Instant Release from Used Candu Fuels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

J. C. Tait ,
R. J. J. Cornet ,
L. A. Chant ,
J. Jirovec ,
J. McConnell  and
D. L. Wilkin
J. C. Tait
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada.
R. J. J. Cornet
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.
L. A. Chant
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.
J. Jirovec
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.
J. McConnell
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada.
D. L. Wilkin
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

Chlorine-36 has been identified as a potential source of radiological risk in the disposal of nuclear fuel waste. The radioisotope 36Cl (t1/2 = 3 × 1O5 a) is produced by neutron activation of Cl impurities in UO2 fuel. The total average Cl impurity level in four unirradiated CANDU UO2 fuel samples was 2.3 ± 1.1 ppm. ORIGEN-S calculations using a 5 ppm Cl impurity in a CANDU fuel resulted in a 36Cl activity comparable to the activity of 129I and 14C produced in the fuel thus requiring 36Cl to be considered in disposal risk assessments. The “instant release” of 36Cl from the gap and grain boundary regions of the fuel to solution was measured by leaching both clad fuel and fuel samples crushed to grain-sized particles. The 36Cl concentration was measured by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. The 36Cl releases from fuel samples taken from 8 different fuel bundles ranged from 0.5% to 20.4% of the total 3 Cl inventory over a leaching period of 32 days. The 36Cl released was found to correlate with the stable Xe gas release, the fuel burnup and the linear power rating (LPR). For a typical CANDU fuel with an LPR of -42 kW/m, the “instant release” of 36Cl would be about 5% of the total inventory.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 465: Symposium II – Scienfific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX , 1996 , 503
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Atomie Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10711, 1994.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, L.H. and Shoesmith, D.W.. Spent Fuel, in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future. Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (Editors). Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. 1988.Google Scholar
3. Johnson, L.H., LeNeveu, D.M., Shoesmith, D.W., Oscarson, D.W., Gray, M.N., Lemire, R.J. and Garisto, N.C. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report. AECL-10714, 1994.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, L.H., LeNeveu, D.M., king, F., Shoesmith, D.W., Kolar, M., Oscarson, D.W., Sunder, S., Onofrei, C. and Crosthwaite, J.L.. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report. AECL-11494–2, 1996.Google Scholar
5. Stroes-Gascoyne, S.. J. Nucl. Mater. 190, P. 87–100. 1992.Google Scholar
6. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Tait, J.C., Garisto, N.C., Porth, R.J., Ross, J.P.M., Glowa, G.A., and Barnsdale, T.R.. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, edited by Sombret, C.G.. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, Strasbourg, France, 1991) p. 373–380.Google Scholar
7. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Tait, J.C., Porth, R.J., McConnell, J.L., Barnsdale, T.R., and Watson, S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, edited by Interrante, C.G. and Pabalan, R.T.. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 294, Boston, USA, 1992). p. 41–46.Google Scholar
8. Stroes-Gascoyne, S. S., Moir, D.L., Kolar, M., Porth, R.J., McConnell, J.L. and Kerr, A.H.. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C.. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, Kyoto, Japan, 1994) p. 625–631.Google Scholar
9. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H. and Sellinger, D.M.. Nucl. Technol. 77, p. 320–330, 1987.Google Scholar
10. Goodwin, B.W., McConnell, D.B., Andres, T.H., Hajas, W.C., LeNeveu, E.M., Melnyk, T.W. et al. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10717, 1994.Google Scholar
11. Johnson, L.H., L.H., Goodwin, B.W., Sheppard, S.C., Tait, J.C., Wuschke, D.M. and Davison, C.C.. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-11213, COG-94–527, 1995.Google Scholar
12. Aitchison, I. and Davies, P.H.. J. Nucl. Mater. 203, 206–220, 1993.Google Scholar
13. Cornett, R.J., Andrews, H.R., Chant, L., Chaput, T., Imahori, Y., Jirovec, J., Kramer, S., Koslowsky, V.T., Milton, G.M. and Milton, J.C.D.. Nucl. Instrum. and Methods in Phys. Research, (in press) 1996.Google Scholar
14. Andrews, H.R., Ball, G.C., Brown, R.M., Cornett, R.J.J., Davies, W.G., Greiner, B.F., Imahori, Y., Koslowsky, V.T., McKay, J., Milton, G.M. and Milton, J.C.D.‥ Nucl. Instrum. and Methods in Phys. Research, B52, p. 243–248 1990.Google Scholar
15. Tait, J.C., Gauld, I. and Kerr, A.H.. J. Nucl. Materials, 223, P. 109–121, 1995.Google Scholar
16. Guenther, R.J., Blahnik, D.E., Campbell, T.K., Jenquin, U.P., Mendel, J. E. and Thornhill, C.K.. Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report, PNL-5109–106 1988.Google Scholar
17. Johnson, L.H. and Joling, H.H.. 1984. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record TR-00280. 1984.Google Scholar