Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:11:50.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of Bacillus Anthracis Spores Using Magnetostrictive Microcantilever-based Biosensor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Liling Fu
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Auburn University, 275 Wilmore Labs,, Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, United States
Suiqiong Li
Affiliation:
[email protected], Auburn University, Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn, AL, 36849, United States
Kewei Zhang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Auburn University, Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn, AL, 36849, United States
Z.-Y. Cheng
Affiliation:
[email protected], Auburn University, Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn, AL, 36849, United States
Get access

Abstract

Recently, the magnetostrictive microcantilever (MSMC) as a high performance biosensor platform was introduced. The MSMC is a wireless acoustic wave (AW) sensor and exhibits a high Q value. More importantly, the MSMC works well in liquid. In this paper, the detection of Bacillus anthracis spores using MSMCs with filamentous phage as the bioprobe is reported. The phased-coated MSMC biosensors were exposed to cultures containing target spores with increasing concentrations ranging from 5 × 104 to 5 × 108 spores/mL. By monitoring the shift in the resonance frequency of the MSMCs, the spores were detected in a real-time manner and a detection limit of 105 spores/mL was obtained for the MSMCs used in this research. Higher sensitivity is expected for the MSMCs with smaller size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ziegler, C., Anal Bioanal Chem 379, 946959 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Raiteri, R., Grattarola, M., Butt, H. J., and Skàdal, P., Sensors and Actuators B 79, 115126 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Zhang, X., Yang, M., Vafai, K., and Ozkan, C. S., Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation 8, 9093 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Ilic, B., Czaplewski, D., Zalalutdinov, M., and Graighead, H. G., Journal of Science & Technology B 19, 28252828 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Ilic, B., Craighead, H. G., Krylov, S., Senaratne, W., Ober, C. and Neuzil, P., Journal of Applied Physics 95, 36943703 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Raiteri, R., Grattarola, M., Butt, H. J., and Skàdal, P., Sensors and Actuators B 79, 115126 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Petrenko, V. A., and Vodyanoy, V.J., J. Microbiol. Methods 53(20), 243252 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Li, Suiqiong, Orona, Lisa, Li, Zhimin, and Cheng, Z.-Y., Appl. Phys. Lett 88, 073507 (2006).Google Scholar
9. Merhaut, Josef, “Theory of Electroacoustics,” McGRaw-Hill Inc., 1981.Google Scholar
10. Yi, J. W., Shih, W. Y., and Shih, W. H., Journal of applied physics 91, 16801686 (2002).Google Scholar
11. Wan, Jiehui, Shu, Huihua, Huang, Shichu, Chen, I-Hsuan, Petrenko, Valery A., Chin, Bryan A., IEEE Sensors Journal, (in press)Google Scholar
12. Lavrik, N. V., Sepaniak, M. J., and Datskos, P. G., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 2229 (2004).Google Scholar