Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:55:00.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detailed Study of Electromigration Induced Damage in Al and AlCuSi Interconnects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

U.E. Möckl
Affiliation:
Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, CA
M. Bauer
Affiliation:
Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, CA
O. Kraft
Affiliation:
Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, CA
J.E. Sanchez Jr
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung and Institut für Metallkunde, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
E. Arzt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung and Institut für Metallkunde, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Because of the continuing miniaturization, electromigration (EM) phenomena are still a key issue in reliability of VLSI metallizations. The present study of EM induced voiding and hillocking was performed on unpassivated conductor lines with various widths and current densities. Stressed and unstressed interconnects were carefully examined with SEM and TEM techniques, especially with regard to void densities, void sizes and characteristic lengths between void and hillock. The fatal void shape was related to current density and line width indicating that the failure mechanism changes with decreasing line width and decreasing current density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rose, J.H., and Spooner, T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, 409 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Atakov, E.M., Clement, J.J., and Miner, B., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, 133 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kraft, O., Sanchez, J.E. Jr, and Arzt, E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 265, 119 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bauer, M., Diploma Thesis, University of Stuttgart, 1993 Google Scholar
5. Black, J.R., IEEE Trans. El. Dev. 16, 338 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Shatzkes, M., and Lloyd, J.R., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3890 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Blech, I.A., J. Appl. Phys. 47, 1203 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Filippi, R.G., Biery, G.A., and Wood, M.H., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, 141 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Arzt, E., and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 6, 731 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Walton, D.T., Frost, H.J., and Thompson, C.V., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 225, 219 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Atakov, E.M., Shepela, A., and Miner, B., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, 401 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Sanchez, J.E. Jr, and Arzt, E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 265, 131 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Greer, A.L., and Shih, W.C., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 265, 83 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kuschke, W.-M., and Arzt, E., submitted to Appl. Phys. Lett. Google Scholar
15. Arzt, E., Kraft, O., and Möckl, U.E., same volume.Google Scholar