Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:55:04.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design, Use and Results from Combinatorial Steady-State Reactors for the Optimization of Highly Selective Heterogeneous Catalysts in Liquid Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

James L Spivack
Affiliation:
Combinatorial Chemistry Laboratory, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USA.
Jimmy Webb
Affiliation:
Cyclics Corporation, Schenectady, NY, USA.
William P Flanagan
Affiliation:
Combinatorial Chemistry Laboratory, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USA.
Cheryl Sabourin
Affiliation:
Combinatorial Chemistry Laboratory, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USA.
Ralph May
Affiliation:
Union College, Schenectady, NY, USA.
Lamyaa Hassib
Affiliation:
Combinatorial Chemistry Laboratory, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USA.
Get access

Abstract

A reactor was designed, built and successfully operated that allowed the simultaneous running of 96 independent reactions at steady-state. Since the problem involved the attainment of 98% in selectivity from a starting point of 93%, very precise reproducibility in selectivity was required. Because selectivity varies with time in a batch reactor, and since commercial reactors for this process are continuous, continuous reactors operated at steady-state were required. Longterm standard deviation in selectivity of <0.2% was attained. Information feedback from so many reactors allowed study of variation in catalyst composition, liquid retention times, space velocity, temperature and other variables to be accomplished in relatively short time. Comparison between heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysis in the same reactors gave insight into the underlying mechanisms determining activity and selectivity. Results from 200 uL reactors scaled very well to laboratory and pilot plant sizes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] De Jong, J I; Dethmers, F H D, Rec. Trav. Chim., 84, 4, 460464, 1965 Google Scholar
[2] : Flanagan, W P; Spivack, J L; Sabourin, C L. U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. (2003), US 2003055295Google Scholar
[3] Column data from GE internal report by Nance, D; Baro, K; & Rajaraman SK, 1999 Google Scholar
[4] : Iwahara, M; Saruwatari, T; (Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Co) Pat JP 2003190805;Google Scholar
Hayashi, H; Hayashi, K, Pat WO 2002042274;Google Scholar
Hayashi, K, Pat JP 2002069023 & 2001335522;Google Scholar
Tanaka, T; Hayashi, K, Pat JP 2002060360;Google Scholar
Sakatani, K; Tanaka, T; Hayashi, K; Sato, N, Pat JP 11246458Google Scholar
[5] Webb, J L; Spivack, J L, (General Electric) Pat. US 6620939 (2003)Google Scholar
[6] Guibert, I; Gubelmann, M; (Rhone-Poulenc Chimie), Pat. Fr. 2685221 and 2685323 (1993)Google Scholar
[7] : Webb, J L; Spivack, J L, (General Electric) Pat. US 6534686Google Scholar