Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:25:29.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and Implementation of Professional Development Seminars in Coordination with Research Experience for Teachers (RET) and Focused on Professional Practices of Scientists and Engineers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Chelsey Simmons ,
Kaye Storm ,
Gary Lichtenstein  and
Beth Pruitt
Chelsey Simmons
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stanford University, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, California, United States
Kaye Storm
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stanford University, Office of Science Outreach, Stanford, California, United States
Gary Lichtenstein
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stanford University, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, California, United States
Beth Pruitt
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stanford University, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, California, United States
Get access

Abstract

Many programs promote professional development for teachers in laboratory settings. In fact, some research has shown these experiences can improve student achievement. However, it is unclear what aspect of the laboratory experience helps bring about this effect. In order to ensure all teachers participating in Stanford's Research Experiences for Teachers program received maximum benefit from the laboratory experience, supplementary seminars were delivered that emphasized a variety of skills and tasks required of career scientists and engineers. Teacher feedback indicates that participants found these seminars valuable and that they would prefer additional time for peer interaction and curriculum development.

Keywords

educationzone refiningZr
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1233: Symposium PP – Materials Education , 2009 , 1233-PP07-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] “National Science Education Standards,” National Research Council: National Academies Press, 1996, p. 262.Google Scholar
[2] Wenglinsky, H., “How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of Teacher Quality,” Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service 2000.Google Scholar
[3] Silverstein, S. C., Dubner, J., et al., “Teachers' participation in research programs improves their students' achievement in science,” Science, vol. 326, pp. 440–2, 2009.Google Scholar
[4] Russell, S. H. and Hancock, M. P., “Evaluation of the Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Program: 2001-2006,” SRI International 2007.Google Scholar
[5] Simmons, P., Emory, A., et al., “Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 36, pp. 930–954, 1999.Google Scholar
[6] Brown, S. L. and Melear, C. T., “Investigation of Secondary Science Teachers: Beliefs and Practices after Authentic Inquiry-Based Experiences,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 43, pp. 938–962, 2006.Google Scholar
[7] Grossman, P., Compton, C., et al., “Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective,” Teachers College Record, vol. 111, pp. 2055–2100, 2009.Google Scholar
[8] “Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering,” National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
[9] Barker, K., At the Bench: A Laboratory Navigator. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2005.Google Scholar