Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:51:01.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dependence of Battery Performance of Spinel Li1+XMn2O4 on the Preparation Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Masaki Yoshio
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, Saga University, 1 Honjo, Saga 840, Japan
Yongyao Xia
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, Saga University, 1 Honjo, Saga 840, Japan
Kazutaka Ikeda
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, Saga University, 1 Honjo, Saga 840, Japan
Hideyuki Noguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, Saga University, 1 Honjo, Saga 840, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The formation process of the spinel phase by the melt-impregnation method was extensively investigated by the pore volume distribution measurement. Two kinds of the spinel structure compounds Li1+xMn2O4 optimized in this method were examined as a 4V cathode in a lithium nonaqueous cell. The first one has an initial charge capacity of 135-147 mAh/g and an unstable rechargeability with the characteristic two-step process, and another one delivers a slightly lower capacity of 105-120 mAh/g and ideal rechargeability with the quasi-one step process. These compounds preserve a capacity of more than 110 mAh/g for the first 100 cycles. The capacity fading on cycling of the former spinel only occurs at the second charge plateau in the rage of x<0.4 in LixMn2O4, and is due to the unstable two-phase structure for lithium intercalation coexisting in this region. The excellent rechargeability for the later spinel results from a homogeneous reaction occurring over the entire intercalated region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference:

1 Tarascon, J.M. and Guyomard, D., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 2864(1991).Google Scholar
2 Hunter, J., J. Solid State Chem., 39,142 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Tarascon, J.M., Wang, E., SkoKoohi, F.K., Mckinnon, W.R. and Colson, S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 2859 (1991).Google Scholar
4 Manev, V., Momchilov, A., ., Nassalevska and Kozawa, A., J. of Power Sources, 43–44 551(1993).Google Scholar
5 Tarascon, J.M., Mckinnon, W.R., Coowar, F., Bowmer, T.N., Amatucci, G. and Guyomard, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 141,1421(1994).Google Scholar
6 Yoshio, M., Inoue, S. and Nakamura, H., Japanese Electrochem. Soc. 58, 477(1990).Google Scholar
7 Yoshio, M., Inoue, S., Hyakatake, M., Piao, G., and Nakamura, H., J. Power Source, 34, 147(1991).Google Scholar
8 Yoshio, M., Noguchi, H., Miyashita, T., Nakamura, H. and Kozawa, A., J. Power Sources, 54, 483(1995).Google Scholar
9 Xia, Y., Takeshige, H., Noguchi, H. and Yoshio, M., J. Power Sources, accepted (1995).Google Scholar
10 Yoshio, M., Noguchi, H., Nakamura, H., Xia, Y., Takesige, H. and Ikeda, K., Japanese Electrochem. Soc., submitted.Google Scholar