Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:02:08.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Densification of Monosdisperse Iron Nanoparticles from a Colloidal Dispersion at Moderate Heating Rates and Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Nathan B Crane ,
Emanuel Sachs  and
Samuel M Allen
Nathan B Crane
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, PO Box 5800 MS 1245, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States, 505-284-7841
Emanuel Sachs
Affiliation:
[email protected], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, United States
Samuel M Allen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Materials Science and Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

This work reports on the densification of iron nanoparticles heated at moderate rates without applied pressure as observed by TEM imaging, gas adsorption pore size measurement, and X-ray diffraction. Despite a low packing density, the small pore size is amenable to significant densification by pressureless sintering. Carbon residues from the stabilizing ligands affect both the composition and processing of the particles. This approach is amenable to deposition on non-planar or fragile substrates. Additionally, large areas can be processed in parallel.

Keywords

sinteringnanostructuredensification
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 903: Symposium Z – Amorphous and Nanocrystalline Metals for Structural Applications , 2005 , 0903-Z08-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Buffat, P. and Borel, J-P., Physical Review A, 13, 2287 (1976).Google Scholar
2 Huang, D., Liao, F., Molesa, S., Redinger, D., Subramanian, V., Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 150, G412 (2003).Google Scholar
3 Bulthaup, C. A., Wilhelm, E. J., Huber, B. N., Ridley, B. A.., and Jacobson, J. M., Applied Physics Letters, 79, 1525 (2001).Google Scholar
4 Szczech, J. B., Megaridis, C. M., Gamota, D. R., and Zhang, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 624, 23.Google Scholar
5 Chung, J., Beiri, N. R., Ko, S., Grigoropoulos, C. P., Poulikakos, D., Applied Physics A, 79, 1259 (2004).Google Scholar
6 Groza, J. R., Nanostructured Materials: Processing, Properties, and Applications, William (Andrew Publishing, 2002), p 115–178.Google Scholar
7 Bourell, D. L., and Kaysser, W. A., Metallurgical Transactions A, 25A, 677, (1995).Google Scholar
8 Mayo, M. J., Chen, D.J, and Hague, D. C., Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications, Institute of Physics Publishing, Philadelphia, 1996.Google Scholar
9 Murray, C. B., Kagan, C. R., and Bawendi, M. G., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 30, 545 (2000).Google Scholar
10 Crane, N. B., Sachs, E. M., and Frank, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 860E, Warrendale, PA, 2005), LL3.3. Google Scholar
11 Crane, N. B., PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2005.Google Scholar
12 German, R. M, Sintering Theory and Practice, Wiley, New York, 1996, pp 110–111.Google Scholar