Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:40:34.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defects in Metals–Detected by Spin Precession Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

TH. Wichert  and
E. Recknagel
TH. Wichert
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D–7750 Konstanz, Fed. Rep.Germany
E. Recknagel
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D–7750 Konstanz, Fed. Rep.Germany
Get access

Abstract

Recent advances in the study of point defects and small defect clusters by nuclear methods will be reviewed. Suitable radioactive atoms which fulfill the requirements of spin precession techniques are introduced into solids, where they are used as microscopic probes to investigate their immediate surrounding. Trapping, detrapping or annealing of defects is reflected by changes of the hyperfine interaction between the nuclear moments of the probe atoms and the electromagnetic fields of the defects. The interaction is extracted from a time differential spin precession pattern or–more obviously–from the Fourier transform of it, which can be regarded as the resonance spectrum of the involved frequencies. It allows a distinct recognition of different defects and comprises detailed information about their structural properties. Experimental data on interstitials, vacancies and clusters in metals will be quoted as illustrations for the scope of information, which can be achieved by hyperfine interaction studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 3: Symposium – Nuclear and Electron Resonance Spectroscopies Applied to Materials Science , 1980 , 211
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Frauenfelder, H., Steffen, R.M. in: Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy, edited by Siegbahn, K., Vol. II, p. 997 (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1965).Google Scholar
2. Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th. in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ion Beam Modification of Materials Albany, USA 1980, to be published in Nucl. Instr. Meth.Google Scholar
3. Kaufmann, E.N. and Vianden, R.J., Rev. Mod. Phys., 51, 161 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Deicher, M., Echt, O., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th., contribution to this conference, p.Google Scholar
5. Seeger, A. in: Hydrogen in Metals I, edited by Alefeld, G., Völkl, J. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1978) p. 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Site Characterization and Aggregation of Implanted Atoms in Materials, edited by Perez, A. and Coussement, R. (Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dorenburg, K., Gladisch, M., Herlach, D., Mansel, W., Metz, H., Orth, H., zu Putlitz, G., Seeger, A., Wahl, W. and Wigand, M., Physik, Z., B31, 165 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Brown, J.A., Heffner, R.H., Leon, M., Schillaci, M.E., Cooke, D.W. and Gauster, W.B., Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 1513 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Herlach, D. in: Proceedings of the Second International Topical Meeting on Muon Spin Rotation, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1980.Google Scholar
10. Graf, H., Möslang, T., Recknagel, E., Weidinger, A., Wichert, Th, Grynszpan, R.I., to be published.Google Scholar
11. Graf, H., Balzer, G., Recknagel, E., Weidinger, A. and Grynszpan, R.I., Phys. Rev. Lett., 44, 1333 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Hohenemser, C., Arends, A.R., de Waard, H., Devare, H.G., Pleiter, F. and Drentje, S.A., Hyperfine Interactions, 3, 297 (1977).Google Scholar
13. Deicher, M., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th., Rad. Effects, to be published.Google Scholar
14. Rinneberg, H. and Haas, H., Hyperfine Interactions, 4, 678 (1978).Google Scholar
15. Wichert, Th., Deicher, M., Echt, O., Recknagel, E., Phys, Rev. Lett., 41, 1659 (1978).Google Scholar
16. Mansel, W. and Vogl, G., J. Phys., F7, 253 (1977).Google Scholar
17. Rinneberg, H., Semmler, W. and Antesberger, G., Phys. Lett., 66A, 57 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Semmler, W., Butt, R., Müller, H.G. in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Hyperfine Interactions, Berlin 1980, edited by Haas, H. and Kaindl, G., to be published in Hyperfine Interactions.Google Scholar
19. Deicher, M., Minde, R., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th. in ref. 18Google Scholar
20. Wichert, Th., Deicher, M., Recknagel, E., to be published.Google Scholar
21. Wilkens, M. in: Fundamental Aspects of Radiation Damage in Metals, edited by Robinson, M.T. and Young, F.W. Jr. (US–ERDA–Conf. 751006, 1976) p. 98.Google Scholar
22. Weidinger, A., Wessner, R., Wichert, Th. and Recknagel, E., Phys. Lett. 72A, 369 (1979) andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidinger, A., Wessner, R., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th. in ref. 2.Google Scholar
23. Witthuhn, W., Weidinger, A., Sandner, W., Metzner, H., Klinger, W. and Böhm, R., Z. Physik, B33, 155 (1979).Google Scholar
24. Deicher, M., Echt, O., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th. in ref. 18.Google Scholar