Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:20:33.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defects in [1, 6-DI(N-Carbazolyl)-2, 4-Hexadiyne] Diacetylene Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Jun Liao
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2136
David C. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2136
Get access

Abstract

The effect of solution concentration on the morphology of [l, 6-di(N-carbazolyl)-2, 4-hexadiyne] (DCHD) diacetylene crystals has been studied by conventional TEM, SAED, and HREM. Crystals obtained by evaporating 0.1 wt% DCHD-chloroform solution on amorphous carbon films are fibrous (about 3 μm wide and 100 μm long) and have defects such as kinks, pores, cracks, and dislocations. Two characteristic single crystal textured morphologies are found in these crystals: (1) a microfibrillar structure consisting of highly-oriented crystallites, with greater axial sizes than lateral sizes, slightly misorienting with a standard deviation of 3°; and (2) a“cross-hatched”structure consisting of highly-oriented crystalline domains separated by two groups of obliquely oriented boundary planes which make (45+/-3) and (37+/-3) angles respectively with the [001] chain direction. Crystals obtained by evaporating more dilute (0.01 wt%) DCHD-chloroform solutions onto amorphous carbon films are about 0.1–0.2 μm long and 0.05–0.1 μm wide and have the chain axis oriented perpendicular to the carbon support film. For these crystals, lateral-chain-invariant (LCI) small angle grain boundaries have been found in HREM images of the [001] zone axis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Young, R. J., Read, R. T., and Petermann, J., J. Mater. Sci., 16, 1835 (1981)Google Scholar
2. Read, R. T. and Young, R. J., Phil. Mag. A, 42, 629 (1980)Google Scholar
3. Galiotis, C., Read, R. T., Yeung, P. H. J., and Young, R. J., J. Polymer Sci.: Polymer Phys. Edi., 22, 1589(1984)Google Scholar
4. Robinson, I. M., Yeung, P. H. J., Galiotis, C., Young, R. J., and Batchelder, D. N., J. Mater. Sci., 21, 3440 (1986)Google Scholar
5. Le Moigne, J., Thierry, A., Chollet, P. A., Kajzar, F., and Messier, J., J. Chem. Phys., 88, 6647 (1988)Google Scholar
6. Donovan, K. J. and Wilson, E. G., Phil. Mag. B, 44, 9 (1981)Google Scholar
7. Read, R. T. and Young, R. J., J. Mater. Sci‥ Lett., 16, 2922 (1981)Google Scholar
8. Cohen, Y. and Thomas, E. L., Macromolecules, 21, 433 (1988)Google Scholar
9. Grubb, D. T., Prasad, K., and Adams, W., Polymer, 32, 1167 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Martin, D. C. and Thomas, E. L., Macromolecules, 24, 2450 (1991)Google Scholar
11. Martin, D. C. and Thomas, E. L., Phil. Mag. A, 64, 903 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Young, R. J. and Yeung, P. H., J. Mater. Sci. Letters, 4, 1327 (1985)Google Scholar