Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:06:48.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deep Borehole Disposal Research: What have we learned from numerical modeling and what can we learn?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2015

Karl P Travis  and
Fergus G F Gibb
Karl P Travis
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.
Fergus G F Gibb
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

Geological disposal of HLW and spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in very deep boreholes is a concept whose time has come. The alternative – disposal in a mined, engineered repository is beset with difficulties not least of which are the constraints placed upon the engineered barriers by the high thermal loading. The deep borehole concept offers a potentially safer, faster and more cost-effective solution. Despite this, international interest has been slow to materialize, largely due to perceived problems with retrievability and uncertainty about the ability to drill accurate vertical holes with diameters greater than 0.5 m to a depth of 4-5 km. The closure of Yucca Mountain and the subsequent recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Commission have lead to a renewed interest in deep borehole disposal (DBD) and the US DoE has commissioned Sandia National Labs, working with industrial and academic partners (including the University of Sheffield), to undertake a program of R&D leading to a demonstration borehole being drilled somewhere in the continental USA by 2016.

In this paper, we focus on some of the key safety and engineering features of DBD including methods of sealing the boreholes, sealing and support matrices for the waste packages. Numerical modeling has, and continues to play, a significant role in expanding and validating the DBD concept. We report on progress in the use of modeling in the above contexts, paying particular attention to constraints on the engineering materials resulting from high heat loading.

Keywords

waste managementthermal conductivitygeologic
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1744: Symposium EE – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXVIII , 2015 , pp. 193 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beswick, A. J., Gibb, F. G. F. and Travis, K. P., “Deep borehole disposal of nuclear waste: engineering challenges”, Energy, 167, pp 47–66 (2014).Google Scholar
NDA Report No. NDA/RWMD/083, “Geological Disposal: Review of options for accelerating implementation of the Geological Disposal programme”, pp 31–37, (2011).Google Scholar
Gibb, F. G. F., Travis, K. P., McTaggart, N. A., and Burley, D. “High-density support matrices: - key to the deep borehole disposal of spent nuclear fuel”, J. Nuc. Materials, 374, pp 370–377 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, F. G. F., Travis, K. P., McTaggart, N. A., and Burley, D., “A model for heat flow in deep borehole disposals of high- level nuclear waste”, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 113, B05201-B00508, (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, F. G. F. and Travis, K. P., “Deep borehole disposal of higher burn up spent nuclear fuels”, Mineralogical Magazine, 76, 3003 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attrill, P. G. and Gibb, F. G. F., “Partial melting and recrystallization of granite and their application to deep disposal of radioactive waste. Part 1 – rationale and partial melting.”, Lithos 67(1-2), 103–117 (2003); Attrill, P. G. and Gibb, F. G. F., “Partial melting and recrystallization of granite and their application to deep disposal of radioactive waste. Part 2 – recrystallization.”, Lithos 67(1-2), 119-133(2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar