Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T12:36:32.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deconvolution of Neutron Scattering Data from a Pulsed Spallation Source

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. W. Richardson Jr.
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
R. C. Birtcher
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
S.-K. Chan
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

Diffraction peak shapes generated from high purity, low strain uranium silicide powder have been used to deconvolute diffraction peaks from radiation damaged material. The deconvolution was based on the assumption that defect scattering near a strained Bragg peak could be represented as the summation of a series of discrete peaks with the same convoluted peak shape measured for unirradiated material in the same range of d-spacing. Discrete peaks were taken to have the same density as the measured time of flight data so that a deconvoluted scattering intensity was generated at each experimental point. This deconvolution technique accounts in a natural manner for peak asymmetries arising from the time structure of the neutron pulse shape and instrument broadening without arbitrary analytical functions and fitting parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Ehrhart, P. and Schlagheck, U., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 4 (1974) 1575.Google Scholar
2 Chan, S.K., Birtcher, R.C. and Richardson, J.W. Jr., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp Proc, this vol.Google Scholar
3 Jorgensen, J. D., Faber, J. Jr., Carpenter, J. M., Crawford, R. K., Haumann, J. R., Hitterman, R. L., Kleb, R., Ostrowski, G. E., Rotella, F. J. and Worlton, T. G., J. Appl. Cryst. 22 (1989) 321.Google Scholar
4 Jorgensen, J. D. and Rotella, F. J., J. Appl. Cryst. 15 (1982) 27.Google Scholar
5 Hofman, G. L., J. Nucl. Mat. 140 (1986) 256.Google Scholar