Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:03:37.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dealing with Uncertainty in the Chemical Environment in Bentonite Backfill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

R.C. Arthur
Affiliation:
Intera Information Technologies, Environmental Division, 3609 South Wadsworth Blvd., Denver, CO 80235
M. J. Apted
Affiliation:
Intera Information Technologies, Environmental Division, 3609 South Wadsworth Blvd., Denver, CO 80235
J. L. Conca
Affiliation:
Washington State University Tri-Cities, 100 Sprout Rd., Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Analytical and conceptual deficiencies in understanding compositional variability in the smectite clays are expected to generate uncertainty in models used to simulate the chemical environment in bentonite backfill. Equilibrium models accounting for nonstoichiometry in smectite can nevertheless bound ranges in aqueous solution compositions that are an explicit function of the uncertainty in smectite compositions. In one approach, we quantify uncertainty in terms of ranges in concentrations of octahedral and tetrahedral Al, and exchange-site cations and vacancies. Heterogeneous mass transfer in bentonite-water systems is modeled using conventional mass-action relations and standard Gibbs energies for stoichiometric minerals, and the site-occupancy constraints combined with site-mixing relations for smectite. The resultant bounding conditions in groundwater compositions may be large or small depending on which aqueous species are of interest in a given situation, but they are valid irrespective of whether equilibrium in smectite-water reactions is attained or is inhibited by slow intracrystalline reaction rates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. McKinley, G., The Geochemistry of the Near-Field, TR 84 - 48, Nagra (1985).Google Scholar
2. Grim, R.E. and Guven, N., Bentonites - Geology. Mineralogy. Properties and Uses, (Elsevier, New York, 1978), 256 p.Google Scholar
3. Lippmann, F., N. Jahrb. Min. Abh. 130, 243-263 (1977).Google Scholar
4. May, H.M., Kinniburgh, D.G., Helmke, P.A. and Jackson, M.L., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 50, 1667 - 1677 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Drever, J.I., The Geochemistry of Natural Waters, (Prentice-Hall, N.J., 1982) 388p.Google Scholar
6. Tardy, Y. and Garrels, R.M., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 38, 1101-1116 (1974).Google Scholar
7. Aagaard, P. and Helgeson, H.C., Clays and Clay Min. 31, 207-217 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Helgeson, H.C. and Aagaard, P., Amer. Jour. Sci. 285, 769-844 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Velde, B., Introduction to Clay Mineralh, (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992) 198p.Google Scholar
10. Robie, R.A., Hemingway, B.S. and Fisher, J.R., Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Relatedf uhstances at 298.15 K and 1 bar (105 pascals) Pressure and at Higher Temperatures (U. S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1452, 1978) 456p.Google Scholar
11. Berman, R.G., J. Petrology 29, Part 2, 455522 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Tardy, Y., Duplay, J., and Fritz, B., Stability Fields of Smectites and Illites as a Function ot Tetoart and Chemical Composition, TR 87-20, Nagra (1987).Google Scholar
13. Sielhnan, M., Uotila, H., and Rantanen, J. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, edited by Bates, I.K. and Seefeldt, W.B (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 84, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) pp. 781 - 790.Google Scholar
14. Melamid, A, Pitkäinen, P., Olin, M., Muurinen, A., and Snellman, M.. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, edited by Sombret, C.G., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 257, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992)pp. 557 - 566.Google Scholar
15. Conca, J.L., Apted, M.J., and Arthur, R.C., this volume.Google Scholar