Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:38:33.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Damage, Strain and Quantum Confinement Issues in Dry Etched Semiconductor Nanostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Y. S. Tang  and
C. M. Sotomayor Torres
Y. S. Tang
Affiliation:
Nanoelectronics Research Centre, Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
C. M. Sotomayor Torres
Affiliation:
Nanoelectronics Research Centre, Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Get access

Abstract

Semiconductor quantum wires and dots have been fabricated in GaAs/AlGaAs, CdTe/CdMnTe and Si/SiGe multiple quantum wells using electron beam patterning and reactive ion etching and studied by photoreflectance, photoluminescence and Raman scattering. It was found that the smaller the lateral size of the nanostructure, the smaller the fabrication induced residual strain. In all cases, the dominant strain component is found to be parallel to the sample growth direction, i.e., along the etched sidewalls of the etched wires and dots. The lateral confining potential is found to be quasi-parabolic for polar semiconductor systems. Possible ways of using and controlling the damage and residual strain in nanostructures are discussed in the context of device applications of nanostructures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 405: Symposium K – Surface/Interface and Stress Effects in Electronic Materials Nanostructures , 1995 , 99
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For example, Davies, J. H. and Long, A. R., ed.:, Physics of Nanostructures. IOP Publishing, Bristol, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Rahman, M., Johnson, N. P., Foad, M. A., Long, A. R., Holland, M. C. and Wilkinson, C. D. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, p.2335 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Tang, Y. S., Wilkinson, C. D.W., Smith, D. W., Whall, T. E. and Parker, E. H. C., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 33, p. 2348 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Wilkinson, C. D. W, Smith, D. W, Whall, T. E. and Parker, E. H. C., Superlatt. Microstruct., 12, p.535 (1992); see also Solid State Commun. 85, p.199 (1993); 86, p. 129 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Tang, Y. S., Wang, P. D., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Lunn, B. & Ashenford, D. E., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 6487(1995).Google Scholar
6. Qiang, H., Pollak, F. H., Tang, Y. S., Wang, P. D. and Torres, C.Sotomayor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, p.2830 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Holy, V., Darhuber, A. A., Bauer, G., Wang, P. D., Song, Y. P., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor and Holland, M. C., Phys. Rev. B 52, p.8348 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Tang, Y. S. and Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Solid State Phenomena 47–48, p.613 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Leitch, W. E., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Lootens, D., Thoms, S., Vandaele, P., Stanley, C. R., Demeester, P. and Beaumont, S. P., Surf. Sci. 263, p. 622 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Song, Y. P., Wang, P. D., Torres, C. M. Sotomayor and Wilkinson, C. D. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, p.3388 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Tang, Y. S., Sotomayor-Torres, C. M., Wilkinson, C. D.W., Smith, D. W., Whall, T. E. and Parker, E. H. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, p.497 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Ribayrol, A., Tang, Y. S., Zhou, H. P., Coquillat, D., Torres, C. M. Sotomayor, Lascaray, J. P., Lunn, B., Ashenford, D. E., Feuillet, G. and Cibert, J., J. Cryst. Growth (1995) (in press)Google Scholar
13. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Nilsson, S., Dietrich, B., Kissinger, W., Whall, T. E. & Parker, E. H. C., J. Cryst. Growth (1995) (in press)Google Scholar
14. Cheung, R., Thoms, S., Watt, M., Foad, M. A., Sotomayor-Torres, C. M., Wilkinson, C. D.W., Cox, U. J., Cowley, R. A., Dunscombe, C. and Williams, R. H., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 7, p.1189 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Foad, M. A., Hefferman, S..Chapman, J. N. and Wilkinson, C. D. W., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 112, p.293 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Tang, Y. S., unpublished results; and also G.Phillips, private communication.Google Scholar
17. Cheung, R., private communication.Google Scholar
18. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Dietrich, B., Kissinger, W., Whall, T. E. & Parker, E. H. C., Solid State Commun. 94, p.369 (1995).Google Scholar
19. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M. Sotomayor, Nilsson, S., Dietrich, B., Kissinger, W., Whall, T. E., Parker, E. H. C., Presting, H. & Kibbel, H., Solid State Electronics (1995) (in press)Google Scholar
20. Aspnes, D. E. in Handbook on Semiconductors, edited by Balkanski, M. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980), Vol.2.Google Scholar
21. Tang, Y. S., J. Appl. Phys. 69, p.8298 (1991).Google Scholar
22. Wang, P. D., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, J. Appl. Phys. 74, p.5047 (1993).Google Scholar
23. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M. Sotomayor, Whall, T. E., Parker, E. H. C., Presting, H. & Kibbel, H., J. Mater. Sci.: Materials for Electronics 6, p.356 (1995).Google Scholar
24. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Kubiak, R. A., Whall, T. E., Parker, E. H. C., Presting, H. & Kibbel, H., J. Electron. Mater. 24, 99 (1995).Google Scholar
25. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Ni, W. X., Hansson, G. V., Kubiak, R. A., Whall, T. E., Parker, E. H. C., Presting, H. & Kibbel, H., J. Electron. Mater. 25, (1996)(to be published).Google Scholar
26. Tang, Y. S., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor, Smith, D. W., Kubiak, R. A., Whall, T. E., Parker, E. H. C., Presting, H. & Kibbel, H., in Physics of Semiconductors, ed. by Lockwood, D. J. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995) p.1735.Google Scholar
27. Tang, Y. S., Ni, W. X., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor and Hansson, G. V., Electron. Lett. 31, p.1385 (1995).Google Scholar
28. Tang, Y. S., Ni, W. X., Torres, C. M.Sotomayor and Hansson, G. V., Appl. Surf. Sci. (to be published in Spring 1996).Google Scholar
29. For example, Lockwood, D. J., Baribeau, J. M., Phys. Rev. B 45, p.8565 (1992).Google Scholar
30. Gumbs, G., Huang, D., Qiang, H., Pollak, F. H., Wang, P. D., Torres, C. M. Sotomayor and Holland, M. C., Phys. Rev. B 50, 10962(1994)Google Scholar
31. Tang, Y. S. et al, unpublished data.Google Scholar
32. Jusserand, B. and Dahl, C., presented in Phantoms Strategic Domain Meeting: Physics and Technology of Mesoscopic Structures Cambridge, UK, 1–5 Oct. 1995.Google Scholar