Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:21:57.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cw Argon Ion Laser Annealed B and as Implanted Diodes in Oxide Defined Silicon Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. O. Sedgwick
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA
P. M. Solomon
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA
H. J. Vollmer
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we present detailed reverse leakage data on laser annealed diodes which were formed by implanting 1 × 1013 and 1 × 1014 /cm2 B atoms at 20 keV and by implanting 1× 1014 and 1× 1015/cm2 As atoms at 50 keV into Si. The implant is made into bare Si through oxide windows where 1700Å thermal SiO2 is both the implant mask and the diode edge passivation. The thermal controls were annealed at 900°C for the B and 950°C for the As for 30 minutes. Diode reverse leakage curves versus voltage are reported for devices with variable perimeter to area ratios. The results indicate that B diodes can easily be made with characteristics similar to thermally annealed devices with leakage at 1V in the 10−9 A/cm2 range. For As implanted diodes, the results are mixed. For As implants of 1 × 1014 /cm2 the diodes had leakage currents at 3V in the high 10−9 A/cm2 range. At the 1 × 1015/cm 2 level devices with significantly higher leakage values at high reverse bias were obtained. The leakage and sheet resistance are determined in both cases and an optimum is shown as a function of laser power.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gat, A., Gibbons, J. F., Magee, T. J., Peng, J., Deline, V. R., Williams, P. and Evans, C. A. Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 32(5), 276 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Sandow, P. M., Proc. of the Symposium on Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Electron Materials, The Electrochemical Soc. PV 80–1 p. 187.Google Scholar
3. Peng, J. D., Palkuti, L. J., Teng, T. C. and Skinner, C., presented at the Solid State Device Research Conf., June 1980, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
4. Koyangi, M., Tamura, H., Miyao, M., Hashimoto, N. and Tokuyama, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 35(8),621 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Tokuyama, T., Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, ed. White, C. W. and Peercy, P. S., Academic Press, New York, 1980, p. 608.Google Scholar
6. Kimmerling, L C. and Benton, J. L., Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, ed. White, C. W. and Peercy, P. S., Academic Press, New York, 1980, p. 385.Google Scholar
7. Benton, J. L., Doherty, C. J., Ferris, S. D., Kimmerling, L. C., Leamy, H. J. and Celler, G. K., Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, ed. White, C. W. and Peercy, P. S., Academic Press, New York, 1980, p. 430.Google Scholar