Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:43:45.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

C-V and DLTS Investigations of GaAs/InGaAs/GaAs Strained Quantum Well Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

S. Subramanian
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India
B. M. Arora
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India
A. K. Srivastava
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India
S. Banerjee
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India
G. Fernandes
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we report a modified Kroemer's analysis for the determination of the band offset (ΔEc) of single quantum well (SQW) structures from simple C-V measurements. The experimental carrier profile from an MOVPE grown pseudomorphic GaAs/InGaAs/GaAs strained SQW structure shows a sharp accumulation peak bounded by depletion regions on either side. The full width at half maximum of the accumulation peak is comparable to the width of the quantum well. The value of ΔEC obtained from C-V measurement is in good agreement with the values determined by simulation and photoluminescence measurements. DLTS measurements on our SQW samples do not show any peaks which is contrary to the published reports. We believe that it is necessary to carefully isolate the role of interface states, before assigning a DLTS peak to emission from the quantum well.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kroemer, H., Chin, W. Y., Harris, J. S. Jr. and Edwall, D. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 295 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Mathews, J. W. and Blakeslee, A. E., J. Cryst. Growth 27, 118 (1974).Google Scholar
3. Letartre, X., Stievenard, D. and Barbier, E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1047 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Subramanian, S., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1211 (1988).Google Scholar