Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:51:13.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crystalline Perfection of Epitaxial Structure: Correlations with Composition, Thickness, and Elastic Strain of Epitaxial Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Balakrishnam R Jampana
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Delaware, Materials Science and Engineering, Newark, Delaware, United States
Nikolai N Faleev
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Delaware, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Newark, Delaware, United States
Ian T Ferguson
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Robert L Opila
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Delaware, Materials Science and Engineering, Newark, Delaware, United States
Christiana B Honsberg
Affiliation:
[email protected], Arizona State University, Electrical Engineering, Tempe, Alabama, United States
Get access

Abstract

Crystalline perfection of InGaN epi-layers is the missing design parameter for InGaN solar cells. Structural deterioration of InGaN epi-layers depends on the thickness, composition and growth conditions as well. Increasing the InGaN epi-layer thickness beyond a critical point introduces extended crystalline defects that hinder the optical absorption and electrical properties. Increasing the InGaN composition further reduces this critical layer thickness. The optical absorption band edge is sharp for III-nitride direct band gap materials. The band edge profile is deteriorated by creation of extended crystalline defects in the InGaN epitaxial material. The design of InGaN solar cells requires the growth of epi-layers where a trade off between crystalline perfection and optical absorption properties is reached.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Trybus, E. Namkoong, G. Henderson, W. Burnham, S. Doolittle, W. A. Cheung, M. and Cartwright, A. Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 288, pp. 218224, 2006 Google Scholar
2 Jani, O. Ferguson, I. Honsberg, C. and Kurtz, S. Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, p. 132117, 2007 Google Scholar
3 Jani, Omkar K, Jampana, Balakirshnam, Mehta, Mohit, Yu, Hongbo, Ferguson, Ian T, Opila, Robert, Honsberg, Christiana B, Proceedings of 33rd IEEE PVSC, San Diego, May 2008 Google Scholar
4 Dahal, R. Pantha, B. Li, J. Lin, J. Y. Jiang, H. X. Applied Physics Letters, v 94, n 6, p 063505, Feb. 2009 Google Scholar
5 Neufeld, C.J. Toledo, N.G. Cruz, S.C. Iza, M. DenBaars, S.P. Mishra, U.K. Applied Physics Letters, v 93, n 14, p 143502, Oct. 2008 Google Scholar
6 Faleev, Nikolai, Jampana, Balakrishnam, Pancholi, Anup, Jani, Omkar, Yu, Hongbo, Ferguson, Ian, Stoleru, Valeria, Opila, Robert, and Honsberg, Christiana, Proceedings of 33rd IEEE PVSC, San Diego, May 2008 Google Scholar
7 Faleev, N. Honsberg, C. Jani, O. and Ferguson, I. Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 300, pp. 246–50, 2007 Google Scholar
8 Faleev, N. Lu, H. Schaff, W.J. Journal of Applied Physics, 101, 093516 (2007)Google Scholar