Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:25:37.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crystalline Oxides on Silicon – Alternative Dielectrics for Advanced Transistor Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Rodney McKee
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6118
Fred Walker
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6118
Matt Chisholm
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6118
Get access

Abstract

Since the advent of the integrated circuit in 1959 and the introduction of MOS capacitors in the early ‘60’s, electronic technology has relied on silica (SiO2) as the gate dielectric in a field effect transistor. However, silica-based transistor technology is approaching fundamental limits. Feature-size-reduction and the ever-demanding technology roadmaps have imposed scaling constraints on gate oxide thickness to the point where excessive tunneling currents make transistor design untenable; an alternative gate dielectric is needed. Crystalline oxides on silicon (COS), simply by virtue of their high dielectric constants, could fundamentally change the scaling laws for silicon-based transistor technology. More importantly, COS could provide the opportunity for an entirely new device physics based on anisotropic response of crystalline oxides grown commensurately on a semiconductor. In this paper, we report that high dielectric constant alkaline earth and perovskite oxides can be grown in perfect registry with silicon. Commensurate heteroepitaxy between the semiconductor and the oxide is established via a sequenced transition that uniquely addresses the thermodynamics of a layer-by-layer energy minimization at the interface. The perfection of the physical structure couples directly to the electrical structure, and we thus obtain the unparalleled result of an equivalent oxide thickness of less than I nm in a MOS capacitor. With this demonstration it is apparent that COS presents a functional alternative to SiO2. With COS, a transistor gate can not only exhibit a much higher dielectric response, but add entirely new capabilities such as logic-state retention with the anisotropic response of ferroelectric polarization in a ferro-gated device. COS is the basis for fundamental change in semiconductor technology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Looney, D.H., U.S. Patent No. 2791758(1957); W.L. Brown, U.S. Patent No. 2791759(1957); I.M. Ross, U.S. Patent No. 2791760(1957); J.A. Morton, U.S. Patent No. 2791761(1957).Google Scholar
2 Watanabe, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1,770 (1995).10.1063/1.113362Google Scholar
3 Prins, M.W.J., Grosse-Holz, K.O., Muller, G., Cillessen, J.F.M., Giesbers, J.B., Weening, R.P., and Wolf, R.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, p. 3,650 (1996).10.1063/1.115759Google Scholar
4Special issue, Ferroelectrics”, JJAP 35, No 9B (1994).Google Scholar
5Special issue, Electroceramic Thin Films”, MRS Bull 21, No. 7 (1996).Google Scholar
6 Beach, D.B., private communication (1999).Google Scholar
7 Gilbert, S.R., Wessels, B.W., Neumayer, D.A., Marks, T.J., Schindler, J.L., and Kannewurf, C.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 335, p. 41 (1994).10.1557/PROC-335-41Google Scholar
8 Chen, H., Yen, B.M., Bai, G.R., Liu, D., and Chang, H.L.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 335, p. 35 (1994).10.1557/PROC-335-35Google Scholar
9 Shichi, Y., Tanimoto, S., Goto, T., Kurowa, K, and Tarui, Y., JJAP 33 part 1, p. 5,172 (1994).Google Scholar
10 Kado, Y. and Arita, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 61 2398(1987); H. Mori and H. Ishiwara, JJAP 30, L1415 (1991).10.1063/1.337957Google Scholar
11 McKee, R.A., Walker, F.J. and Chisholm, M.F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, p. 3,014 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3014Google Scholar
12 Tung, R. T., Poate, J. M., Bean, J. C., Gibson, J. M., and Jacobson, D. C., Thin Solid Films 93, p. 77, (1982).10.1016/0040-6090(82)90093-1Google Scholar
13 Alexe, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, p. 2,283 (1998)10.1063/1.121337Google Scholar
14 Phillips, J. M., in Silicon-Molecular Beam Epitaxy, edited by Kasper, E. and Bean, J.C. (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1988), Vol. 1, p. 135.Google Scholar
15 Bean, J.C., in Silicon-Molecular Beam Epitaxy, edited by Kasper, E. and Bean, J.C. (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1988), Vol. 2, p. 65.Google Scholar
16 Akiyama, M., Kawarada, K., Hishi, S. and Kaminishi, K., Materials Research Society Meeting, Palo Alto, Calif., April 1986.Google Scholar
17 McKee, R.A., Walker, F.J., Conner, J.R. and Raj, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, p. 2,818 (1993).10.1063/1.110297Google Scholar
18 Massalski, T. B., Murray, J. L., Bennett, L. H., and Baker, H., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1986), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
19 Evers, J., J. Less-Common Met. 58, p. 58 (1978).10.1016/0022-5088(78)90072-3Google Scholar
20 Evers, J., J. Less-Common Met. 69, p. 399 (1980).10.1016/0022-5088(80)90299-4Google Scholar
21 Janzon, K. H., Schafer, H., and Weiss, A., Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 372, p. 87 (1970).10.1002/zaac.19703720110Google Scholar
22 Wells, A. F., Structural Inorganic Chemistry (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK 1975), p. 498.Google Scholar
23 McKee, R. A., Walker, F. J., Conner, J. R., and Specht, E.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (7), p. 782 (1991).10.1063/1.105341Google Scholar
24 McKee, R.A., Walker, F.J., Specht, E.D., Jellison, G.E. Jr., Boatner, L.A. and Harding, J.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, p. 2,741 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2741Google Scholar
25 Arora, Narain, MOSFET Models for VLSI Circuit Simulation - Theory and Practice (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993), Chapter 4.10.1007/978-3-7091-9247-4Google Scholar