Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:27:50.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Evaluation of Macroscopic Theories for Multi-Component Diffusion in Ideal Langmuir Sorbents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Nieck E. Benes  and
Henk Verweij
Nieck E. Benes
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Ohio State University, 2041 College Road, Columbus OH 43210–1178, USA Internet: www.mse.eng.ohio-state.edu/fac_staff/faculty/verweij/
Henk Verweij
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering & MESA+ Research Institute, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Internet: http://ims.ct.utwente.nl/personen/docenten/benes.html
Get access

Abstract

Materials research involves many areas for which a proper understanding of multi-component mass transport is essential. Examples include sintering and transport-limited reaction in syntheses. In addition, materials may be principally designed for direct manipulation of mass transport, as in membrane materials. Macroscopic descriptions for mass transport are available, but physical interpretation of related transport parameters is generally not straightforward and often relies on microscopic considerations. We will show that, even for diffusion in a simple ideal Langmuir type lattice, macroscopic theories should be used with caution. Differences in mobilities of dissimilar species can set off percolation behavior, causing the flux of the more mobile species to vanish. Such behavior is, for instance, observed for zeolite membranes and cannot be predicted by commonly accepted macroscopic transport theories. Correlations between successive movements of molecules cause a decrease in the self-diffusion coefficient, DS. For non-equilibrium transport it can be shown that correlation effects in most cases disappear in which case non-equilibrium transport becomes related to the component diffusion coefficient D, instead of the smaller DS.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 752: Symposium AA – Membranes–Preparation, Properties and Applications , 2002 , AA8.12
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Einstein, A., Annal. Phys., 17, 549 (1905).Google Scholar
2. Schmalzried, H., Festkörperreaktionen, Chemie des festen Zustandes. (Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1971) eqn. 5–8.Google Scholar
3. Kizilyalli, M., Corish, J., and Metselaar, R., Pure & Appl. Chem. 71, 1307 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Benes, N.E. and Verweij, H., Langmuir 15, 8292 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Benes, N.E., Bouwmeester, H. J. M., and Verweij, H., Chemical Engineering Science 57, 2673 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Coppens, M-O., Bell, A. T., and Chakraborty, A. K., Chemical Engineering Science 53, 2053 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Bardeen, J. and Herring, C., in Imperfections in Nearly Perfect Crystals. edited by Schockly, W., Hollomon, J. H., Maurer, R., and Seitz, F. (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1952)Google Scholar
8. Tahir-Kheli, R. A. and Elliot, R. J., Phys. Rev B. 27, 844 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Wicke, E. and Kallenbach, R., Koloid Z. 97, 135 (1941).Google Scholar
10. Kapteijn, F., Bakker, W. J. W., Van De Graaf, J., Zheng, G., Poppe, J., and Moulijn, J. A., Catalysis Today 25, 213 (1995).Google Scholar