Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T05:14:14.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crack Deflection and Interfacial Fracture Energies in Alumina/SiC and Alumina/TiN Nanocomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Jiao  and
M. L. Jenkins
S. Jiao
Affiliation:
Oxford Centre for Advanced Materials and Composites, Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3PH, UK
M. L. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Oxford Centre for Advanced Materials and Composites, Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3PH, UK
Get access

Abstract

Crack/particle interactions in Al2O3/SiC and Al2O3/TiN nanocomposites have been observed by TEM on samples containing cracks produced by Vickers indentations. No significant crack deflection by intragranular SiC particles or microcracking around nanoparticles was found. Intergranular cracks were observed to be deflected into the matrix grains by SiC particles on grain boundaries inclined to the direction of crack propagation. TiN particles were not effective in this way. These features are briefly discussed within the framework of the interfacial fracture energies. These were calculated from interfacial energies, which were determined by the measurement of grain boundary-interface dihedral angles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 457: Symposium V – Nanophase and Nanocomposite Materials II , 1996 , 401
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Faber, K.T. and Evans, A. G., Acta Metall., 31, 565–84 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Niihara, K., The Centennial Memorial Issue of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 99, p. 974–982(1991).Google Scholar
3. Walker, C.N., Borsa, C.E., Todd, R.J., Davidge, R.W. and Brook, R.J., British Ceram. Proc. 53, 249–264 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Borsa, C.E., Jiao, S., Todd, R.I. & Brook, R.J., J. Microscopy., 177, 305–312 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Hockey, B.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 54, 331 (1971).Google Scholar
6. Smith, C.S., Trans AIME, 175, 15(1948)Google Scholar
7. Bruce, R.H., Science of Ceramics. 2, p. 359–367 (1965)Google Scholar
8. Handwerker, C.A., Dynys, J.M., Cannon, R.M., and Coble, R.L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73, 1371–77(1990).Google Scholar
9. Jiao, S., Jenkins, M.L. and Davidge, R.W., Acta Mater. (1996) in press.Google Scholar
10. He, M.Y., and Hutchinson, J.W., Int. J. Solids Strut., 25, 1053–67 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Jiao, S. and Jenkins, M.L., to be published in Phil. Mag. A.Google Scholar