Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:20:02.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coupled Simulations of Mechanical Deformation and Microstructural Evolution Using Polycrystal Plasticity and Monte Carlo Potts Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C.C. Battaile ,
T.E. Buchheit ,
E.A. Holm ,
G.W. Wellman  and
M.K. Neilsen
C.C. Battaile
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411, [email protected]
T.E. Buchheit
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411, [email protected]
E.A. Holm
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411, [email protected]
G.W. Wellman
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411, [email protected]
M.K. Neilsen
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The microstructural evolution of heavily deformed polycrystalline Cu is simulated by coupling a constitutive model for polycrystal plasticity with the Monte Carlo Potts model for grain growth. The effects of deformation on boundary topology and grain growth kinetics are presented. Heavy deformation leads to dramatic strain-induced boundary migration and subsequent grain fragmentation. Grain growth is accelerated in heavily deformed microstructures. The implications of these results for the thermomechanical fatigue failure of eutectic solder joints are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 538: Symposium J – Multiscale Modelling of Materials , 1998 , 269
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Frear, D.R., in Solder Mechanics: A State of the Art Assessment, edited by Frear, D.R., Jones, W.B., and Kinsman, K.R. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1991), pp. 191–237.Google Scholar
[2] Buchheit, T.E., Bourcier, R.J., Wellman, G.W., and Neilsen, M.K., Mater. Sci. Eng. 5, pp. 421–437 (1997).Google Scholar
[3] Kocks, U.F., Tom, C.N., and Wenk, H.-R., Texture and Anisotropy: Preferred Orientations in Polycrystals and Their Effect on Materials Properties. 1998, Cambridge University Press: New York, NY. p. 676.Google Scholar
[4] Anderson, M.P., Srolovitz, D.J., Grest, G.S., and Sahni, P.S., Acta Metall. 32, pp. 783–91 (1984).Google Scholar
[5] Srolovitz, D.J., Anderson, M.P., Sahni, P.S., and Grest, G.S., Acta Metall. 32, pp. 793–802 (1984).Google Scholar
[6] Beck, P.A., in Metal Interfaces, edited by Brick, R.M. (ASM, Cleveland, OH, 1952), pp. 208–47.Google Scholar
[7] Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., and Teller, E., J. Chem. Phys. 21, pp. 1087–92 (1953).Google Scholar
[8] Bortz, A.B., Kalos, M.H., and Lebowitz, J.L., J. Comp. Phys. 17, pp. 10–8 (1975).Google Scholar
[9] Hassold, G.N. and Holm, E.A., Comp. in Phys. 7, pp. 97–107 (1993).Google Scholar
[10] Anderson, M.P., Grest, G.S., and Srolovitz, D.J., Phil. Mag. B 59, pp. 293–329 (1989).Google Scholar