Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T01:45:29.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coupled Process Modeling and Waste-Package Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

B. P. Mcgrail  and
D. W. Engel
B. P. Mcgrail*
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. 0. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
D. W. Engel*
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. 0. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
*
(a) Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830
(a) Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830
Get access

Abstract

The interaction of borosilicate waste glasses with water has been studied extensively, and reasonably good models are available that describe the reaction kinetics and solution chemical effects. Unfortunately, these models have not been utilized in performance assessment analyses, except in estimating radionuclide solubilities at the waste form surface. A geochemical model has been incorporated in the AREST code to examine the coupled processes of glass dissolution and transport within the engineered barrier system. Our calculations show that the typical performance assessment analyses using fixed solubilities or constant reaction rate at the waste form surface are not always conservative or realistic predictions of radionuclide release. Varying the transport properties of the waste package materials is shown to produce counterintuitive effects on the release rates of some radionuclides. The use of noncoupled performance assessment models could lead a repository designer to an erroneous conclusion about the advantages of one waste package design or host rock setting over another.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 294: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI , 1992 , 215
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pigford, T. H., Chambré, P. L., and Lee, W. W.-L.. A Review of Near-Field Mass Transfer in Geologic Disposal Systems. LBL-27045, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California (1990).Google Scholar
2. Grindrod, P. M., Williams, M., Impey, M., and Grogan, H.. STRENG: A Source Term Model for Vitrified High Level Waste. NAGRA Technical Report, NTB 90-48, Badan, Switzerland (1990).Google Scholar
3. Engel, D. W., McGrail, B. P., Worgan, K., and Apted, M. J.. AREST-PNC Model Description. PNWD-1919, PACE Program FY 1991 Summary Report, PNC PA0865 92-001, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, WA (1992).Google Scholar
4. Strachan, D. M., McGrail, B. P., Apted, M. J., Engel, D. W., and Eslinger, P. W.. Preliminary Assessment of the Controlled Release of Radionuclides from Waste Packages Containing Borosilicate Waste Glass. PNL-7591, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1990).Google Scholar
5. Apted, M. J. and Hodgkinson, D. P., in Proceedings of the Topical Meeting on Nuclear Waste Packaging FOCUS '91. (Amer. Nucl. Soc., La Grange Park, IL, 1991) pp. 24-31.Google Scholar
6. Bruton, C. J. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI. edited by Apted, M. J. and Westerman, R. E. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 112, Pittsburgh, PA,1988) pp. 607–619.Google Scholar
7. Parkhurst, D. L., Thorstenson, D. C., Plummer, L. N.. PHREEQE - A Computer Program for Geochemical Calculations. USGS/WRI-80-96, U.S. Geological, Survey, Reston, Virginia (1980).Google Scholar
8. Aagaard, P. and Helgeson, H. C., Am. J. Sci. 282, 237 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Grambow, B., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII. edited by Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R. C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
10. Bourcier, W. L., Peiffer, D. W., Knauss, K. G., McKeegan, K. D., and Smith, D. K., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII edited by Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P. W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA) pp. 209–216.Google Scholar
11. Knauss, K. G., et al. , in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII edited by Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P. W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) pp. 371–381.Google Scholar
12. Grambow, B. E., Hermansson, H. P., Bjérner, I. K., Christensen, H., and Werme, L., in Nuclear Waste Management II. edited by Clark, D. E., White, W. B., and Machiels, A. J. (Advances in Ceramics 20, Amer. Cer. Soc., Westerville, OH, 1986) pp. 465–474.Google Scholar