Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:57:43.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation of Electrical, Dielectric And Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Ralf Strümpler
Affiliation:
ABB Corporate Research, CH-5405 Baden-Dättwil, Switzerland, [email protected]
Joachim Glatz-Reichenbach
Affiliation:
ABB Corporate Research, CH-5405 Baden-Dättwil, Switzerland, [email protected]
Felix Greuter
Affiliation:
ABB Corporate Research, CH-5405 Baden-Dättwil, Switzerland, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The electrical and dielectric response upon thermal expansion and contraction of polymer composites have been studied for thermoset polymers containing ceramic or metallic fillers. Before curing, the resistivity p of epoxy containing a metallic filler is in the range of 106 to 107 Ωcm. During curing a sudden reduction of p by eight orders of magnitude is observed. The shrinkage of the polymer during cross-linking and the build-up of internal stresses results in a lower interparticle contact resistance. The contraction can be reversed by heating. Around curing temperature, the resistivity increases by six to eight orders of magnitude due to the expansion of the material. The resistivity increases progressively until the percolation network of the conducting particles is interrupted and the composite reaches a high-ohmic state. Surprisingly, the critical temperature is related to the curing temperature and not to the glass transition temperature, as would be generally expected. Changes of the interparticle gap size can also be observed in the dielectric constant ε. For conducting fillers covered by a thin oxide layer, ε decreases by several orders of magnitude after a certain expansion has been achieved. However, for poorly conducting or insulating fillers dielectric response becomes insensitive to the gap distance. Hence, the electrical or dielectric response of polymers containing metallic fillers can be used as a sensitive probe for the internal stress state and the corresponding micro-structure of the composite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Newnham, R.E. and Ruschau, G.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 436480 (1991)Google Scholar
2. Newnham, R.E., Ferroelectrics 68, 132 (1986)Google Scholar
3. Strümpler, R., Kluge-Weiss, P. and Greuter, F., in Advances in Science and Technology 10, Intelligent Materials and Systems, edited by Vincenzi, P., Techna S.r.I. 1995) pp. 1522 Google Scholar
4. Strümpler, R., Rhyner, J., Greuter, F. and Kluge-Weiss, P., J. of Smart Mat. and Struct. 4 (1995) 215222 Google Scholar
5. McLachlan, D.S., Blaszkiewicz, M. and Newnham, R.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 21872203 (1990)Google Scholar
6. Ruschau, G.R., Yoshikawa, S. and Newnham, R.E., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 953959 (1992)Google Scholar
7. Yoshikawa, S., Ota, T. and Newnham, R.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 263– 67 (1990)Google Scholar
8. Pramanik, P.K., Khastgir, D., De, S.K. and Saha, T.N., J. Mat. Sci. 25, 38483853 (1990)Google Scholar
9. Hu, K.A., Moffatt, D., Runt, J., Safari, A. and Newnham, R.E., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 70, 583– 85 (1987)Google Scholar
10. Moffatt, D., Runt, J.P., Halliyal, A. and Newnham, R.E., J. Mat. Sci. 24, 609614 (1989)Google Scholar
11. Shrout, T.R., Moffatt, D. and Huebner, W., J. Mat. Sci. 26, 145154 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Meyer, J., Polymer Eng. and Sci. 14, 706716 (1974)Google Scholar
13. Hansson, T., ABB Review 4/92, 3538 (1992)Google Scholar
14. McLeod, A.D., Haggerty, J.S. and Sadoway, D.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 705708 (1984)Google Scholar
15. Samsonov, G.V., Kovenskaya, B.A. and Serebryakova, T.I., Izv. Vuzov Fizika, I 19 (1971)Google Scholar
16. Pober, R.L. and Clougerty, E.V., RTD-TRD 63–4096 Part I Report (1963)Google Scholar