Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:05:47.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation Between Optical Absorption and Refractive Index of Silica and Silicate Glasses Implanted with Copper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. A. Weeks ,
H. Hosono ,
R. Zuhr ,
R. Magruder  and
H. Mogul
R. A. Weeks
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235
H. Hosono
Affiliation:
Visiting Scientist from Nagoya Inst. of Technology, Nagoya 466, Japan
R. Zuhr
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
R. Magruder
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235
H. Mogul
Affiliation:
Graduate student University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221
Get access

Abstract

The refractive indices and optical absorptions of Cu implanted glasses have been measured. Silica and two silicate glasses have been implanted with Cu+ to nominal doses ranging from 3×1015 cm−2 to 6×1016 cm−2 at an energy of 160KeV and currents of ∼4μAcm−2. Substrate temperatures, during implantation, ranged from ∼100K to 700K. Both refractive index and optical absorption of the silica are functions of dose and substrate temperature. Neither of these properties are significantly altered in the silicate glasses for any dose or substrate temperature. The observed increases in the index of the implanted silica are attributed to an optical band due to Cu0 colloids.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 152: Symposium H – Optical Materials: Processing and Science , 1989 , 115
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Townsend, P.D., Rep. Prog. Phys. 50, 501–558 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Arnold, G. and Borders, J.A., J. App. Phys. 48, 1488 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Whichard, G., Mogul, H.C., Weeks, R.A., Stark, J.D., and Zuhr, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc 126, 105 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Stark, J.D., Weeks, R.A., Whichard, G., Kinser, D.L., and Zuhr, R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 96, 685 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Tessman, J.R., Kahn, A.H., and Shockley, W., Phys. Rev. 92, 890 (1953).Google Scholar
6. Bruckner, R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 5, 122 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Parke, S. and Webb, R.S., Phys. Chem. of Glasses 13, 157 (1972).Google Scholar
8. Antonini, M., Camagni, P., Gibson, P.N., and Manara, A., Rad. Eff. 65, 41 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hughes, A.E. and Jain, S.C., Adv. in Phys. 28, 717 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Trotter, D.M. Jr., Schreurs, J.W.H., and Tick, P.A., J. App. Phys. 51, 4657 (1982).Google Scholar