Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:57:03.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation between Activation Volume and Pillar Diameter for Mo and Nb BCC Pillars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Andreas S. Schneider ,
Blythe G. Clark ,
Carl P. Frick  and
Eduard Arzt
Andreas S. Schneider
Affiliation:
[email protected], Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, Stuttgart, Germany
Blythe G. Clark
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Carl P. Frick
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Wyoming, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laramie, Wyoming, United States
Eduard Arzt
Affiliation:
[email protected], INM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials and Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Compression tests with varying loading rates were performed on [001] and [235] oriented small-scale bcc Mo and Nb pillars to determine the contribution of thermally activated screw dislocation motion during deformation. Calculated activation volumes were shown to be in the range of 2 - 9 b3 and by further examination were found to decrease with pillar diameter. This suggests that the kink-pair nucleation of screw dislocations is enhanced by surface effects in the micron and submicron range.

Keywords

Mostress/strain relationshipnanoscale
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1185: Symposium II – Probing Mechanics at Nanoscale Dimensions , 2009 , 1185-II07-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Uchic, M.D., Dimiduk, D.M., Florando, J.N., and Nix, W.D., Science 305, 986 (2004).10.1126/science.1098993Google Scholar
2. Greer, J.R., Oliver, W.C., and Nix, W.D., Acta Materialia 53, 1821 (2005).10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031Google Scholar
3. Dimiduk, D.M., Uchic, M.D., and Parthasarathy, T.A., Acta Materialia 53, 4065 (2005).10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.023Google Scholar
4. Volkert, C.A. and Lilleodden, E.T., Philosophical Magazine 86, 5567 (2006).10.1080/14786430600567739Google Scholar
5. Frick, C.P., Clark, B.G., Orso, S., Schneider, A.S., and Arzt, E., Materials Science and Engineering A 489, 319 (2008).10.1016/j.msea.2007.12.038Google Scholar
6. Kiener, D., Motz, C., Schoberl, T., Jenko, M., and Dehm, G., Advanced Engineering Materials 8, 1119 (2006).10.1002/adem.200600129Google Scholar
7. Brinckmann, S., Kim, J.-Y., and Greer, J.R., Physical Review Letters 100, 15502 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.155502Google Scholar
8. Schneider, A.S., Clark, B.G., Frick, C.P., Gruber, P.A., and Arzt, E., Materials Science and Engineering A 508, 241 (2009).10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.011Google Scholar
9. Tang, M., Kubin, L.P., and Canova, G.R., Acta Materialia 46, 3221 (1998).10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00006-8Google Scholar
10. Asaro, R.J. and Suresh, S., Acta Materialia 53, 3369 (2005).10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047Google Scholar
11. Weinberger, C. R. and Cai, W., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 14304 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0806118105Google Scholar
12. Schneider, A. S., Kaufmann, D., Clark, B.G., Frick, C.P., Gruber, P.A., Mönig, R., Kraft, O., and Arzt, E. (in preparation).Google Scholar