Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:05:49.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copper-Alloyed Artefacts from Roman Imports in Scandinavia: Elemental Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Haldis Johanne Bollingberg*
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Oestervoldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Chemical analyses and polished section studies have been made on selected artefacts from the period 1 to 400 AD found in Scandinavia. By means of a multielement method used on 2 - 4 milligram solid sample (OES), the copper alloys are found to be quite characteristic for various groups of artefact. The trace elements underline systematic differences in form and age whithin the same stylistic type produced over a long period. The workshops seem to have had their own tradition for using different alloys for various parts of a specific artefact. The fact that the same type of artefact is produced in bronze as well as brass, probably indicates a different origin. Based on these results analyses have been started on a few available ingots and ore minerals in the attempt to trace the provenance of Scandinavian artefacts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hansen, U. Lund, Römischer Import im Norden (Nord. Fortidsminder B, 10, København, 1987), pp. 1488.Google Scholar
2. Bollingberg, H.J. and Hansen, U. Lund in Archaeology and Natural Science, 1, edited by Fisher, P. (Poul Åstrøms Forlag, Jonsered, 1993), p. 24; in Die Alamannenbeute, edited by E. Kiunzl (Monogr. RGZM. 34, Mainz, 1993) p. 457.; Nederlandse Arch. Rapp. in press (1994).Google Scholar
3. Riederer, J., in Toreutik und figurlische Bronzen römischer Zeit. Akten der 6.Tagung Oiber antike Bronzen, Berlin 1980, edited by U. Gehrig, 220-225 (Berlin 1984).Google Scholar
4. Bollingberg, H.J. in Himlingøie, Seeland - Europe, edited by Hansen, U. Lund (Nordiske Fortidsminder, Copenhagen, in press, 1994).Google Scholar
5. Bayley, J., presented at the 1984 Smithson. Inst. Sym., Washington D.C., 1984.Google Scholar
6. Hughes, M.J., in Aspects of Early Metallurgy, edited by Oddy, A. (BM Occas. Paper, 17, London, 1980), p.41.Google Scholar
7. Rabeisen, E. and Menu, M., in Researches Gallo-Romaines I, (de la Réunion des Musées nat., Paris, 1985) pp. 141181 Google Scholar
8. Penhallurick, R.D., Tin in antiquity. (The institute of Metals, London, (1986) p. 225.Google Scholar
9. Bachmann, H.-G and Jochenhivel, A., RGZM Arch. Korr. 4, 139 (1974).Google Scholar
10. Tylecote, R.F., Ghaznavi, H. A. and Boydell, P. J., J.Arch. Sc. 4, 305 (1977).Google Scholar
11. Klein, S., Frankfurter Geowiss. Arb. C, 13, (J. W. Goethe-Universität-Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, 1993) Anl. 10.Google Scholar
12. Bollingberg, H.J. (unpublished).Google Scholar
13. Joachim, H.-E, Bonner Jahrb. 173, 139 (1973).Google Scholar
14. Nordahl, E., Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags Aktiebolag, Sweden (1961).Google Scholar
15. Janzon, G., in The beginning of the use of Metals and alloys, edited by Maddin, R. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., London, England, 1986).Google Scholar
16. Forshell, H., Theses and Papers in Arch. B, 2, (The Arch. Res. lab., Stockholm Univ., 1992).Google Scholar
17. Forbes, R.J., Studies in ancient technology VIII (E. J. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1971) p. 177.Google Scholar
18. Bollingberg, H.J. and Buchwald, V. (unpublished analyses).Google Scholar
19. Boesterd, M., and Hoekstra, E., Medd. Rijksmus. van Oudheden te Leiden, N.R. XLVI, 100126 (1965).Google Scholar
20. Niewlowski, A., Kwart. Hist. Kult. Mat. R. 3, 301 (1991).Google Scholar