Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:40:37.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Condie Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

N. Ritter
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Whitaker Lab. #5, Bethlehem, PA 18015
B. Avitzur
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Whitaker Lab. #5, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Get access

Abstract

The process of conventional hydrostatic extrusion limits the length of the billet that can be extruded to a length somewhat shorter than that of the chamber. Production units are also limited to pressures of about 8,000 Kg/cm2. Thus the reduction that can be affected in one pass of hydrostatic extrusion of mildly tough materials like low carbon steels or copper is limited to no more than 75% R.A., if the extrusion is performed at room temperature. For subsequent passes, each previous extrudate must be cut to suitable length so it will fit again into the chamber.

The Condie process (Austen, U.S. Pat. #3,999,415) provides the means to perform extrusion through several dies, one die at a time, in one loading of the chamber. In the present model, only two dies are loaded into the chamber together with the billet. A short length is first extruded through the first die, while the second die is kept free to move idly with the extrudate. Then extrusion through the first die ceases and the billet is forced to extrude through the second die. As the second die approaches the first die and the intermediate diameter section shortens, the extrusion stops. Thus, one cycle of a finite length is completed. But, the accumulated reduction from billet to extrudate is large, similar to the reduction obtainable by a single die from a chamber of twice as high a pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Avitzur, B., “Metal Forming: Processes and Analysis,” McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1968; Krieger, Huntington, NY, 1979.Google Scholar
2. Avitzur, B., “Handbook of Metal Forming Processes”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
3. Wistreich, J.G., Investigation of the Mechanics of Wire Drawing, Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. (London), Vol. 169, p. 654, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Pugh, H.Ll.D., “The Mechanical Behavior of Materials Under Pressure,” Elsevier Materials Science Series, 1970.Google Scholar
5. Pugh, H.Ll.D., Recent Development in Cold Forming, Bulleid Memorial Lecture, 1965, Vols. IIIA, IIIB, Univ. of Nottingham Press, Nottingham, England 1965.Google Scholar
6. Alexander, J.M. and Lengyel, B., British Patent Application 12, 326, 1965; 56, 241, 1966; 41, 249, 1967.Google Scholar
7. Slater, H.K. and Green, D., Argumented Hydrostatic Extrusion of Continuous Bar, Paper No. 14, High Pressure Engrg. Conf., London, 11–15 Sept., 1967, Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrg. London, Vol. 182, No. 3c, pp. 109114 (1967–68).Google Scholar
8. Austen, A.R., Method and Apparatus for Extrusion, U.S. Patent No. 3,999,415, Dec. 28, 1976; U.S. Patent No. 4,028,919, June 14, 1977.Google Scholar