Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T17:46:20.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compositionally Dependent Band Offsets In Aln/AlxGa1-xN Heterojunctions Measured By Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R.A. Beach
Affiliation:
T.J. Watson Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
E.C. Piquette
Affiliation:
T.J. Watson Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
R.W. Grant
Affiliation:
T.J. Watson Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
T.C. McGill
Affiliation:
T.J. Watson Sr. Laboratories of Applied Physics California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
Get access

Abstract

Although GaN has been extensively studied for applications in both light emitting and high power devices, the AlN/GaN valence band offset remains an area of contention. Values quoted in the literature range from 0.8eV (Martin)[1] to 1.36eV (Waldrop)[2]. This paper details an investigation of the AIN/AlxGa1-xN band offset as a function of alloy composition. We find an AlN/AlxGa1-xN valence band offset that is nearly linear with Al content and an end point offset for AlN/GaN of 1.36 ± 0.1 eV. Samples were grown using radio frequency plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy and characterized with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS). Core-level and valence-band XPS data for AIN (0001) and AlxGa1-xN (0001) samples were analyzed to determine core-level to valence band maximum (VBM) energy differences. In addition, oxygen contamination effects were tracked in an effort to improve accuracy. Energy separations of core levels were obtained from AlN/AlxGa1-xN(0001) heterojunctions. From this and the core-level to valence band maximum separations of the bulk materials, valence band offsets were calculated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Electronic mail: [email protected]

References

[1] Martin, G., Strite, S., Agarwal, A., Rockett, A., Markoc, H., Lambrecht, W.R.L., and Segall, B, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 610 (1994).Google Scholar
[2] Waldrop, J.R., Grant, R.W. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2879 (1996).Google Scholar
[3] Bloom, S., Harbeke, G., Meier, E, and Ortenburger, I. B., Phys. Status Solidi B66, 161 (1974).Google Scholar
[4] Lambrecht, W.R.L. and Segall, B., Phys. Rev. B 50, 14155 (1994).Google Scholar
[5] Xu, Y.N. and Ching, W.Y., Phys. Rev. B48, 4335 (1993).Google Scholar
[6] Angerer, H. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1504 (1997).Google Scholar
[7] Strite, S. and Markoc, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10, 1237 (1992).Google Scholar