Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:39:41.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Composition and Phase Control for Molybdenum Nitride thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Mandar S. Mudholkar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Levi T. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Get access

Abstract

Molybdenum nitrides are active and selective hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) catalysts. The catalytic properties of molybdenum nitrides were found to be dependent on the structural properties. The purpose of research described in this paper was to synthesize molybdenum nitride thin films with well defined structures and stoichiometries using ion beam assisted deposition. The films were deposited by evaporating Mo metal, and simultaneously bombarding the growing film with low energy nitrogen ions. The phase constituents of the films were determined using x-ray diffraction and the film composition was obtained by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry.

The film composition and phase constituents were strong functions of the ion-to-atom arrival rate ratio, ion energy and ion angle of incidence. Differences in the film composition for different arrival rate ratios and ion angles of incidence were interpreted based on reflection and sputtering effects. Our results suggest that phase formation was governed by the effective energy density per deposited atom. Evaluation of the effective energy density per deposited atom and its physical significance in ion beam assisted deposition is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schlatter, J.C., Oyama, S.T., Metcalfe, J.E., and Lambert, J.M., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 27, 1648 (1988).Google Scholar
2 Colling, C.W. and Thompson, L.T., J. Catal. 146,193 (1994).Google Scholar
3 Choi, J.-G., Brenner, J.R., Colling, C.W., Demczyk, B.G., Dunning, J.L., and Thompson, L.T., Catal. Today 15,201 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Choi, J.G., Lee, H.J., and Thompson, L.T., Appl. Surf. Sci. 78 (1994) 299.Google Scholar
5 Lee, H.J., Choi, J.G., Colling, C.W., Mudholkar, M.S. and Thompson, L.T., accepted for publication, Appl. Surf. Sci. (1994).Google Scholar
6 Mudholkar, M.S. and Thompson, L.T., accepted for publication, J. Appl. Phys. (1994).Google Scholar
7 Vechten, D. Van, Hubler, G.K., and Donovan, E.P., Vacuum 36, 841 (1986).Google Scholar
8 Hubler, G.K., Vechten, D. Van, Donovan, E.P., and Carosella, C.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8,831(1990).Google Scholar
9 Donovan, E.P., Hubler, G.K., Mudholkar, M.S., and Thompson, L.T., Surf. Coat. Technol. (in press).Google Scholar
10 Dobrev, D., Thin Solid Films 92,41 (1982).Google Scholar
11 Bradley, R.M., Harper, J.M.E., and Smith, D.A., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 4160 (1986).Google Scholar
12 McKenzie, D.R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11,1928 (1993).Google Scholar
13 Brighton, D.R. and Hubler, G.K., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B 28, 527 (1987).Google Scholar
14 Targove, J.D. and Macleod, H.A., Appl. Opt. 27, 3779 (1988).Google Scholar
15 Windischmann, H., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1800 (1987).Google Scholar